Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly

张清华,张光武,栗剑,刘家帮,阚金富,张昆,李冬
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2015.016.023
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate curative effect of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Methods Data of 131 femoral neck fracture elderly patients admitted into our hospital and performed hemiarthroplasty from Jun. 2010 to Dec. 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 131 patients,a total of 63 patients(69 hips)were performed with cemented hemiar-throplasty. For comparison,68 patients(68 hips)were performed uncemented hemiarthroplasty. The comparative items included operation time, blood loss,postoperative drainage,ambulatory time,complication incidence,the Harris hip score after the operation. Results The operations were successful in all patients. The uncemented hemiarthroplasty group was found to have a significantly advantages of operation time( P ﹤ 0. 05), and the cemented hemiarthroplasty group was found to have a significantly advantages of blood loss,postoperative drainage,ambulatory time( P ﹤0. 05). Incidence of adverse reactions were 4. 7% and 5. 6% respectively( P ﹥ 0. 05). Good rate of the Harris score were 89. 8% and 91. 3%respectively postoperative 1 year( P ﹥ 0. 05). Conclusion Both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty have good clinic effects for dis-placed femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?