Abstract:Objective To compare the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior laminectomy and fusion(LF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis.Methods From January 2010 to June 2014,54 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis underwent surgical treatment.Among them,29 patients were underwent ACDF,and 25 patients were underwent LF in Department of spine surgery,Tianjin Union Medical Centre.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,fusion segments,Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA)score,Neck Disability Index (NDI),Visual Analog Scale (VAS),change of cervical curvature,range of motion (ROM)and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results Mean operative time was (162.7 ± 21.3) min in the anterior approach group versus (176.3 ± 29.8) min in the posterior group(P ＞ 0.05).Mean intraoperative blood loss was (135.6 ± 27.8)ml in the anterior approach group and (255.2 ±32.3)ml in the posterior approach group(P ＜0.05).Mean fusion levels are (4.1 ±0.3)in the anterior approach group and (5.3 ±0.5) in the posterior approach group (P＜0.05).The mean preoperative JOA score were(8.3 ± 2.7)in the anterior approach group and(8.9 ± 2.1) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative JOA score were (13.6 ± 2.5) in the anterior approach group and (14.0 ± 1.7) in the posterior approach group at final follow-up (P ＞ 0.05).Mean improvement rate was (55.7％ ± 16.3％) in the anterior approach group and (58.3％ ± 15.7％) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean preoperative NDI score were (33.8 ± 11.0) in the anterior approach group and (34.4 ± 8.7) in the posterior approach group (P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative NDI score were (16.9 ±7.5) in the anterior approach group and (15.5 ±8.1) in the posterior approach group at final follow-up (P ＞ 0.05).Mean VAS score were (2.9 ± 1.5) in the anterior approach group and (2.5 ± 1.0)in the posterior approach group before operation(P ＞0.05),they are improved to (1.2 ± 1.2) and (1.2 ±1.3),respectively(P ＞ 0.05).Mean Cobb angle of the operative site were (-24.3 ± 4.4)° in the anterior approach group and (-22.7 ± 3.7) ° in the posterior approach group before operation (P ＞ 0.05).At final follow-up,the Cobb angle of the operative site were (13.7 ± 3.2)° in the anterior approach group and (6.2 ± 4.2) ° in the posterior approach group (P ＜ 0.01).Mean preoperative ROM were (29.0 ± 6.7) ° and (30.4 ±5.4)° in the anterior approach group and posterior approach group,respectively(P ＞ 0.05).Mean postoperative ROM were (11.7 ±6.5) ° and (8.2 ± 5.9) °in the anterior approach group and the posterior approach group,respectively(P ＜ 0.05).There were 16 patients with complications in the anterior approach group and 7 patients with complications in the posterior approach group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion For multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis,ACDF can restore the lordosis better,fuse less levels but have more complications compared with LF.Patients treated with LF can get as good life quality as with ACDF and have less complications although fuse more levels compared with ACDF.

Discectomies and Corpectomies Used Together in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Anterior Discectomies Combined with Corpectomies in Multilevel Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy

Anterior cervical decompression with fusion for treating multilevel cervical myelopathy

Clinical Results of Selective Anterior Corpectomy Combined with Segmental Discectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy

The clinical effect comparison of two methods for treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Segmental anterior cervical decompression with fusion for treating multilevel cervical myelopathy:analysis of the clinical effects

A comparison study of two methods for treating two-level cervical spondylitic myelopathy

Combined Corpectomy in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Ossified Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Multilevel anterior discectomy and fusion for aged patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Multilevel oblique corpectomy without fusion: our experience in 48 patients

Efficacy and Safety of One-Stage Selective Discectomy Combined with Expansive Hemilaminectomy in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Anterior cervical interbody Cage placement for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Reconstruction of spinal function

Comparison of the outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with cervical kyphosis

Clinical study of a cervical anterior hybrid technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Operation Methods for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Comparison of Efficacy

Decompression to Intervertebral Space and Subtotal Ectomy to Vertebral Body for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Three Segments

A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Corpectomy in Patients with Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Four-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Comparison of Two Reconstructive Techniques in the Surgical Management of Four-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Clinical application of anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion and posterior cervical spine canal open-door laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Anterior Cervical Decompression versus Segmental Fusion and Posterior Expansive Canal Plasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy