Comparative Investigation of Evacuation Behavior and Psycho-Analysis of the College Students Before and after Evacuation Test

Xin ZHAN,Ping RAO,Kong-jin ZHU,Shao-bo LIU,Li-zhong YANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2011.05.057

2011-01-01

Abstract:The present paper is to provide a comparative investigation of evacuation behavior and psycho-analysis of the college students before and after evacuation test. As is known, a questionnaire can be made to be an effective solution to making a psycho-analysis and survey of the behaviors of the people in a fire excavation or in any other accidents. In our case, the individual subjects who were to be surveyed are composed of three groups of people, that is, people who have had some real experience in emergency evacuation, people who have some kind of experience of simulated evacuations and the people who have no experience at all with such events. The response of general public surveyed is not enough accurate because they could only guess what the emergencies are. It is just for this reason that we have surveyed twice the same group of people before and after the evacuation test. Thus, it makes it possible for us to compare the results between the general public and those who have experienced simulated evacuations. Taking the college students for example, they were supposed to evacuate from a teaching building in a simulative emergency, when they heard the ring of fire warning. Such experiments were repeated for eight times. And five days later, a questionnaire was distributed to 109 students for their response to the fire warning experience. When they were asked to feed back the emergency test, feedbacks were received from 97 students. The feedback information data to the questionnaires were twice put into the computer with Epidata software to ensure the statistical quality. The statistical feedback results show that there were no significant difference between the and second composition of the subjects. From the analysis data of questionnaires, 67 percent of student-subjects would choose other different exits when the exit was congested in the questionnaire, but only 35 percent of second group of subjects did such choice. That indicated that a good many of subjects overrate their reaction in emergency. Moreover, significant difference can be found between the behaviors of male and female subjects. Whereas 53.3 percent of female subjects chose the item Ask others to affirm the alarm first when she heard the rings of the fire alarm bell. But 43.6 percent of male subjects chose Affirmed the fire himself if he heard the alarm. Besides, the student-subjects who did some kinds of social work were more adept to confirm the fire alarm more independently than the others.