The Social Spatial Structure of Beijing Metropolitan Area and Its Evolution: 1982-2000

冯健,周一星
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2003.04.009
2003-01-01
Geographical Research
Abstract:Based on data of the fifth census of Beijing in 2000 and of the second census in 1982, methods of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis are used to analyze the social spatial structure of Beijing Metropolitan Area and its evolution. In 1982, the main components of social space in Beijing Metropolitan Area include: population of workers and cadres, agricultural population, population of intellectuals, and population of the mining workers; and four types of social areas are identified: (1) high population density, worker areas, (2) intellectual areas, (3) government cadre areas, and (4) mining worker areas. The authors also find that, in 2000, the main components of social space in Beijing Metropolitan Area include the following: population of ordinary workers, agricultural population, temporary population, population of intellectuals and national minorities, and housing condition; and six types of social areas are identified: (1) high density and crowded areas, (2) intellectual and national minority areas, (3) areas of low population density and large living space, (4) temporary population areas, (5) areas of urban population in the outer suburb, and (6) agricultural areas. The authors also extract the model of the social spatial structure of Beijing Metropolitan Area in 1982 and 2000, respectively. In a word, the main components, types and models of social areas, and the forming mechanisms of the social spatial structure of Beijing Metropolitan Area in 2000 changed much, comparing with those in 1982. The model of the social spatial structure of Beijing Metropolitan Area in 1982 is very simple, which shows typical homogeneity as a whole, while the social spatial structure in 2000, which mainly exhibits a zonal pattern, accompanying with a multi-nuclear and a sectoral one, tends to be complex, and shows typical heterogeneity. Finally, the authors put forward a model of interlaced mechanism of the evolution of social spatial structure at the macroscopical, medium and microcosmic levels, and think that it is this kind of mechanism that propelled the social spatial structure of Beijing Metropolitan Area to change from one in the planned economy to one in the market transition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?