Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials about Comparison Mycophenolate Mofetil and Azathioprine after Renal Transplantation

张海涛,王坤杰,李幼平,高励,刘瑾,蔡羽嘉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2004.02.003
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. Methods Searching: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library an d Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM); identified the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and applied Revman 4.11 for statistical analyses. Results Twenty-two RCTs were identified, involving MMF and AZA for anti-rej ection after renal transplantation. The data shown that MMF (2 g/d) was more ben eficial than AZA in improving the graft survival rate of short periods and the l ong-term patient survival rate, but there was no statistical differences betwee n MMF (3 g/d) with AZA. Whether in 6 months or in 1 year after renal transplanta tion, the use of MMF (2 g/d) or MMF (3 g/d) could markedly reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection. Conclusion Comparing with A ZA, MMF is a more potent immunosuppressive drug, and more efficient in reducing the acute rejection after renal transplantation. MMF can improve the graft and p atient survival rate. The 2 gram per day is more acceptable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?