Abstract:Cold snare resection is now recommended for adenomatous polyps <10 mm in size, and there is a growing body of evidence supporting its use for polyps larger than this [1] [2]. For sessile serrated lesions, cold snare resection has been repeatedly demonstrated to be successful, regardless of the lesion size, with or without submucosal injection, possibly owing to the ease of transection and the lack of submucosal fibrosis within sessile serrated lesions [3]. In this issue of Endoscopy , do Espirito Santo et al. report a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1556 patients from seven randomized controlled trials that compared cold snare resection versus cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) using submucosal injection for colonic polyps and found there was no difference in the rates of complete resection, en bloc resection, and adverse events, although C-EMR did have a longer procedure time [4]. Submucosal injection relies on the principle of creating a submucosal cushion to protect the underlying muscle layer from injury or, even worse, perforation. Owing to the reduced depth of resection and the lack of electrocautery use in cold snaring, muscle injuries and perforations are extraordinarily rare. Cold snare resection is known for its higher rate of immediate bleeding than resection using electrocautery, but almost all bleeding after cold snare resection can be stopped with conservative techniques, such as applying tamponade with the waterjet or the scope itself, without the need for clips. The overwhelming safety of cold snare resection should inspire confidence in endoscopists – submucosal injection is likely not needed to reduce the procedure risks for any size of polyp. "As cold snare resection sees expanding indications, submucosal injection may be left out in the cold and only brought in when turning on the heat." If there is no difference between the adverse events for cold resection, why lift? Possibly the answer is to delineate the borders of the lesion to ensure complete resection. The majority of the polyps in this meta-analysis were 10 mm. Additionally, one may use the pressurized waterjet to expand the defect, which can allow for easier inspection of the margins. More studies are needed to understand how submucosal injection affects complete resection for polyps >10 mm. When performing cold snare resection, one should ensure an adequate depth of resection. Additionally, because of the safety of cold snaring, there should be no hesitation in resecting a wide rim of normal tissue around the defect, in an effort to completely eliminate any polyp tissue and reduce possible recurrence. Adequate technique is vital for successful cold snare resection to ensure complete resection, including having the lesion at 5–6 o'clock, placing the snare over the polyp with an adequate rim of normal tissue, anchoring the shaft of the snare so as to prevent slippage of the snare toward the polyp during snare closure, and then resecting. Studies of incomplete resection and high polyp recurrence rates when using cold snaring should also focus on ensuring adequate technique among all of the participating endoscopists. With the proliferation of techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and full-thickness resection, there is a growing emphasis on and ability to perform en bloc resection. Given that all widely available dedicated cold snares are approximately 10 mm, it is not feasible to perform en bloc resection on lesions larger than this, while ensuring an adequate rim of normal tissue. Instead of bundling tissue and possibly having to "pull" it through by applying tension outside the scope, frequently leading to a submucosal cord, which arguably may increase the risk of residual polyp tissue or complications [5], cold snare resection of polyps >10 mm should be undertaken in a piecemeal fashion, with adequate depth and surrounding normal tissue also removed. Malignancy in colonic polyps can often be identified by surface features and morphology. The risk of cancer in polyps in the range 10–19 mm is rare [6]. Even some polyps >20 mm, such as those that are granular or classified as Paris IIa/IIb, have a low risk of submucosal invasion [7]. Beyond the use of submucosal injection or lesions not for cold snare resection, we should also be asking about the limits of cold snare resection in general, given its safety profile compared with other techniques. More studies are needed to understand which large adenomatous lesions in the colon can be routinely resected with cold snare resection and whether submucosal injection is needed. The article by do E -Abstract Truncated-

Endoscopic Polypectomy of Colorectal Flat Sessile Polys after Endoscopic Injection of Saline-Epinephrine

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Flat Colonic Polyp:An Analysis of 18 Cases

Clinical analysis of endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors in the esophagogastric junction

[Endoscopic Therapy of Adenomatous Polyps and Early-Stage Carcinomas of the Colon and Rectum].

Minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder polyps

Clinical Value of Endoscopic Treatment for Large Colorectal Polyps

Safety and efficacy of tip‐in endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps: A single‐center experience in Taiwan

Endoscopic treatment of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer

Value of Endoscopy Combined with Laparoscopy in Treatment of Colorectal Polyps and Polyp Canceration

Endoscopic treatment of colorectal benign-appearing lesions 3 cm or larger: techniques and outcome

Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

Treatment of Colorectal Polyps by Nylon Ligation Combined with Endoscopic High-Frequency Electric Snare

Treatment of Gastrointestinal Polyps by Metallic Clips in Combination with Endoscopy Assisted High-Frequency Electric Snare

Clinical value of endoscopic resection of large rectal polyps

Successful Complete Cure En-Bloc Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasm

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Fiat Colorectal Precancer or Cancer In-Situ Lesions

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treatment of Large Flat Gastric Lesions

Will submucosal injection for colonic polyps get left out in the cold?

Therapeutic Value of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Polypus Protrusion Lesion on Esophagogastric Junction