Radiological classification of hyperextension cervical spinal cord injury and its clinical guiding value
王建杰,程黎明,曾至立,谢宁,麻彬,于研,朱睿,崔志明,海涌,罗卓荆,王哲,周许辉,陈雄生,贾连顺
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20201202-00698
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To innovate a classification of hyperextension cervical spinal cord injury according to the radiological characteristics and to verify its clinical significance.Methods:A retrospective case series study was performed to analyze the clinical data of 88 patients with hyperextension cervical spinal cord injury admitted to Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University between April 2009 and December 2016. The patients included 68 males and 20 females, aged 18-87 years [(52.9±14.8)years]. Hyperextension cervical spinal cord injury was classified by the degree of degeneration (Cheng's classification): type A (non-degenerative spinal stenosis), type B (disc herniation alone), type C (disc herniation along with osteophyte) and type D (ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament). Further, all types were divided into 3 subtypes based on disc-ligmentous complex (DLC) injury and intramedullary signal intensity change: without high-intensity intramedullary signal or DLC injury as subtypes A1, B1, C1 and D1), with high-intensity intramedullary signal but without DLC injury as subtypes A2, B2, C2 and D2, with high-intensity intramedullary signal and DLC injury as subtypes A3, B3, C3 and D3. The concordance rate between intramedullary signal intensity change and DLC injury segment as well as the basic characteristics of different types were analyzed. Types A1 and A2 were treated with non-surgical treatment (22 patients, non-surgical group). Types A3, B, C and D were treated operatively (66 patients, surgical group). The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, ASIA impairment scale (AIS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were assessed before treatment and at final follow-up. According to status of cervical spinal canal degeneration, the patients were further divided into two kinds including non-degeneration (type A) and degeneration (types B, C, D). The age and ASIA score and JOA score before treatment and at final follow-up were compared between two kinds of patients.Results:In all, 4 patients were classified as type A, 22 as type B, 34 as type C and 8 as type D. The majority was patients with degeneration (type B, C, D), accounting for 73% (66/88), of which type B and C accounted for 88% (56/64). Most patients were middle-aged and aged. Intramedullary signal intensity changes were related to the degeneration of the cervical spine, with concordance rate with DLC injury segment for only 40%. The average follow-up duration was 4(1, 6)years (range, 1-9.1 years). In non-surgical group, the ASIA motor score before treatment and at final follow-up were 90(88, 96)points and 100(100, 100)points respectively, the ASIA sensory score before treatment and at final follow-up were 216(212, 221)points and 224(224, 224)points respectively, the AIS in all patients was grade D before treatment and became grade E at final follow-up, the JOA score before treatment and at final follow-up were 13(12, 14)points and 17(17, 17)points respectively. In surgical group, the ASIA motor score before treatment and at final follow-up were 76(62, 86)points and 98(94, 100)points respectively; the ASIA sensory score before treatment and at final follow-up were 204(191, 212)points and 220(212, 224)points respectively; the AIS was grade D in 4 patients, grade B in 3, grade C in 18 and grade D in 41 before treatment and was grade C in 3 patients, grade D in 51 and grade E in 12 at final follow-up; the JOA score before treatment and at final follow-up were 10(7, 11)points and 16(14, 17)points respectively. The ASIA score, AIS and JOA score at final follow-up in both groups were significantly better than that before treatment (
P<0.01). The improvement rate of JOA was 100% in non-surgical group, and was 95% (63/66) in surgical group (
P>0.05). The average age of patients with degeneration [(58.4±11.7)years] was significantly higher than that of patients without degeneration [(38.1±11.9)years] (
P<0.01). The ASIA sensory and motor scores and JOA score of patients without degeneration before treatment were significantly higher than those with degeneration (
P<0.01). At final follow-up, the ASIA sensory and motor scores of patients with or without degeneration were all significantly improved compared with those before treatment (
P<0.05). At final follow-up, the patients with degeneration showed that the JOA score of type C was better than that of type D (
P<0.05), with no statistical significance in ASIA sensory and motor scores as well as JOA score among other types (
P>0.05).
Conclusions:The radiological classification of hyperextension cervical spinal cord injury is established based on the degeneration of the cervical spinal canal, DLC injury and intramedullary signal intensity change. For middle-aged and elderly patients, the more severe the degeneration of the cervical spine, the higher the incidence of DLC injury, the more severe the degree of spinal cord injury, and the more likely to have residual neurological dysfunction. The treatment method is selected according to this classification and the patients' spinal cord function is improved significantly, suggesting that this classification can be effectively used to guide clinical treatment.