Internal urethral sphincter reconstruction with anterior bladder neck tube for robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: improving early return of continence
Zhibin Xu,Jie Zhao,Zhenghui Guan,Maomao Guo,Hao Bian,Zhenchi Li,Wenchao Zhao,Sudong Liang,Yu Liu,Siyang Zhang,Jiangping Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-583
2024-06-30
Abstract:Background: In recent years, despite several surgical techniques having been applied, the early incontinence rate after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains high. In this study, we reconstructed an internal urethral sphincter (IUS) with anterior bladder neck tube (ABNT) to improve early return of continence and find a more effective technique for early urinary incontinence after RP. Methods: In this study, 96 previous patients who did not receive an ABNT between October 2018 and May 2020 were compared as historical controls (the control group). A total of 210 consecutive patients underwent robotic or laparoscopic RP with ABNT between May 2020 and February 2023 (the ABNT group). The inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-1 and localized prostate cancer (clinical stages cT1-3, cN0, cM0). The exclusion criteria included patients with diabetes, neurologic diseases, previous pelvic operations, symptoms of urinary incontinence, prior radiation, focal therapy, or androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. ABNT was reconducted with a U-shaped flap from the anterior wall of the bladder neck, and was then anastomosed with the urethra. In the control group, the bladder outlet was directly anastomosed with the urethra. Continence, as defined if 0 pads were used per day and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score ≤6, was assessed at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after catheter removal. At 2 weeks after catheter removal, urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) and upright urethrography were performed to evaluate the function of ABNT in the ABNT group. Results: More patients in the ABNT group were continent than those in the control group at 1 week (85.2% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001), 4 weeks (91.4% vs. 27.1%, P<0.001), 8 weeks (95.2% vs. 40.6%, P<0.001), 12 weeks (100% vs. 71.9%, P<0.001), and at 24 weeks (100% vs. 87.5%, P<0.001) after catheter removal. Stricture was presented in 5.2% and 2.1% (P=0.34) in the ABNT group and control group, respectively. UPP showed that a functional IUS was reconstructed with ABNT. Upright urethrography showed that the ABNT was filled with contrast medium in the urination period and with no contrast medium during the storage period and interruption of urination. Conclusions: The ABNT technique significantly improved early return of continence in comparison with the no ABNT technique, especially the immediate continence. The ABNT technique reconstructed the functional IUS with acceptable urethral stricture. The limitations of the present study include that the comparison was conducted retrospectively with a historical cohort and lack of randomization, and the single center setting. A prospective, randomized, and multicenter evaluation is expected.