Nephrin Expression in Kidneys of Children with Acquired Renal Diseases

管娜,丁洁,张敬京,肖慧捷,刘景城,杨霁云

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.2001.12.005

2001-01-01

Abstract:Objective Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one of the most common renal diseases in children. NS is characterized by heavy proteinuria clinically and the diffuse fusion of podocyte foot processes under the electron microscopy. The mechanisms of proteinuria are not clear. In 1998, Professor Tryggvason identified the first protein molecule of the slit diaphragm, nephrin. The defect of nephrin is the cause of Finnish type congenital nephrotic syndrome, while the change of nephrin in acquired renal diseases is unknown. In this study, we detected the expression of nephrin in glomerulus of patients with acquired renal diseases in order to disclose the possible effect of nephrin. Methods A total of 89 renal samples was included in this study, among which 73 cases were children with heavy proteinuria (the urinary protein exceeded 1 g/24), 16 cases were children with isolated hematuria. According to the findings of electron microscopy, children with heavy proteinuria were divided into the group with the fusion of foot processes and the group without the fusion of foot processes. Furthermore, children with the fusion of foot processes were also divided into groups with and without minimal change nephrosis. As controls, 4 normal tissues of nephrectomized kidneys from patients with kidney tumors were collected. Immunohistochemistry was performed on biopsy samples. The intensity of staining by immunohistochemistry was semiquantitated by image-analysis system. Results were corrected for reaction efficiency by the expression ratio of nephrin over carcino-embryo-antigen. Results (1) The expressions of nephrin in the group with heavy proteinuria (0.62±0.24) and isolated hematuria (0.67±0.23) showed no significant difference as compared to controls (0.82±0.17). (2) There was no significant difference in the expression of nephrin between groups with and without fusion of foot proceses (0.61±0.25 vs 0.62±0.25). (3) There were no significant differences in the expression of nephrin between groups with and without minimal change nephrosis (0.50±0.15 vs 0.65±0.27). Conclusion With immunohistochemistry, no major alteration in the expression of nephrin in acquired renal diseases was observed.