The influence of postoperative TACE on the survival time and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver resection

Yi-kun DING,Wei-fu LV,Chun-ze ZHOU,Dong LU,Wen-jing TANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2014.04.007
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the influence of postoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembo-lization (TACE) on the survival time and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after liver resection. Methods During the period from January 2008 to November 2012, a total of 92 patients with HCC were admitted to authors’ hospital, and all the patients received TACE after liver resection. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Those patients who showed no lesions on imaging examination within two months after the surgery were classified in prevention group (n=38) and prophylactic TACE was carried out after the surgery. Those patients who did not receive TACE until recurrence was detected on imaging examination were regarded as control group (n = 54). The difference in the survival time between the two groups was analyzed by using Kaplan Meier method, while the related factors influencing postoperative survival time and prognosis were analyzed by using COX regression method. Results No statistically significant difference in the baseline data existed between the two groups. The one-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates of all the patients were 71%, 48% and 41% respectively, with a median survival time of 24.1 months. For the prevention group, the one-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 85.1%, 56.8% and 56.8% respectively, with a median survival time of 39 months. For the control group, the one-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 65.2%, 43.4% and 30.4% respectively, with a median survival time of 21 months. The difference in the cumulated survival rate between the two groups was statistically significant(P = 0.021). Both the single factor analysis and multifactor analysis showed that, like tumor thrombus in portal vein, tumor diameter, ascites, prothrombin time, etc. the use of postoperative prophylactic TACE was a related factor that could significantly influence the postoperative survival time and prognosis. Conclusion The use of postoperative prophylactic TACE can obviously improve the survival rate of liver cancer patients. The tumor diameter is also an independent factor that can significantly affect the prognosis.(J Intervent Radiol, 2014, 23:299-302).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?