Abstract:Oat is a main feed crop in high- altitude areas of western China, but few studies have been done on its silage making. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of silage additives on fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value of different oat varieties (OV) grown in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. Two OV (Avena sativa L. cv. Longyan No.1 (OVL1) and Avena sativa L. cv. Longyan No.3 (OVL3)) were planted in a randomized complete block design, harvested at early dough stage with 32.6% and 34.1% DM, respectively. The fresh material was chopped to 2-cm length and treated with additives (0, Sila-Mix (MIX), Sila-Max (MAX) in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with three replicates. Both additives contained a mixture of lactic acid bacteria and supplied a final application rate of 2.5 × 108 of lactic acid bacteria per kg of fresh forage weight. After 60 d of ensiling, the number of lactic acid bacteria in treated silages was about 10-fold greater than the control and generally resulted in a lower pH and ammonia-nitrogen (P < 0.001), greater total acids and ratios of lactic acid/acetic acid (P < 0.001), and DM recovery (P = 0.028). Treatment with additives also decreased (P < 0.001) the number of yeasts, which resulted in marked (P < 0.001) improvements in aerobic stability with the effect being greatest with MAX. Both additives improved (P ≤ 0.036) the 48-h in situ DM digestion in OVL1, but not in OVL3 (P ≥ 0.052). Treatment with both additives also increased (P ≤ 0.003) NDF digestion in OVL1 while it was improved (P < 0.001) only by MAX in OVL3. In contrast, the additives did not affect (P ≥ 0.088) in situ hemicellulose digestion in OVL1, but it was improved (P = 0.048) by MIX and further improved (P = 0.002) by MAX in OVL3. Treatment with MAX improved yields of digestible DM and digestible NDF in both varieties. Dry matter recovery was not affected (P = 0.121) by variety. Compared to CTRL, silage treated with MAX had a greater (P = 0.015) DM recovery (96.7% vs. 93.9%). Inoculation improved (P < 0.001) aerobic stability. The MAX was the most effective for both varieties, while MIX was intermediate and was more effective in OVL3 than OVL1 silage. The results also showed that in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, compared to OVL1, OVL3 resulted in greater (P ≤ 0.002) yields of digestible nutrients; specifically, treated with MAX improved silage fermentation efficiency, DM recovery, and provided excellent aerobic stability for feeding to ruminants.

Effects of different moisture contents and additives on the quality of baled oat silage

Study on impact of different silage additives on oat silage

Effects of adding corn flour and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality of baling silage of oat and common vetch mixture

Effect of Additives on the Quality and Aerobic Stability of Rice Straw Silage

Effects of Fermentation Interval and Additives on the Quality of Baled Oat and Common Vetch Mixture Silage in an Alpine Area

Effects of Additives and Moisture Content on the Quality of Elymus sibiricns L.Silages

Influence of Ensiling Additives on Silage Quality of Several Oat Cultivars

Interaction Effects of Different Additives and Moisture on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage

Effect of cellulase and lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality, carbohydrate conversion, and microbial community of ensiling oat with different moisture contents

Effects of Cellulase and Xylanase Addition on Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability, and Bacteria Composition of Low Water-Soluble Carbohydrates Oat Silage

Effects of Additive and Moisture Content on Fermentation Quality of Smooth Vetch Silage

Effects of Silage Additives and Varieties on Fermentation Quality, Aerobic Stability, and Nutritive Value of Oat Silage.

Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cellulase on Alfalfa Silage Quality with Different Moisture

Effect of Compound Additives on Nutritional Composition, Fermentation Quality, and Bacterial Community of High-Moisture Alfalfa Silage

Effect of Additives and Filling Methods on Whole Plant Corn Silage Quality, Fermentation Characteristics and in Situ Digestibility

Effects of Wilting and Additives on Fermentation Quality of Alfalfa (medicago Sativa) Silage

Effects of Overnight Wilting and Additives on the Fatty Acid Profile, Α-Tocopherol and Β-Carotene of Whole Plant Oat Silages

Effects of Cutting Stage and Additives on the Fermentation Quality and CNCPS Protein Fractions of Alfalfa Silage

Interactions between additives and ensiling density on quality of Medicago sativa silage

Effect of additive on fermentation quality of mixed silages of oat (Avenasativa)and common vetch (Viciasativa)in Tibet

Mixed silage of Melilotus albus and Avena sativa