Biomechanical Properties of Four Dermal Substitutes.
Zhang Guo-an,Ning Fang-gang,Zhao Nan-ming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200708020-00015
2007-01-01
Abstract:Many kinds of cell-free dermal substitutes have been developed during the past several years, however, their biomechanical properties, including hysteresis, stress relaxation, creep, and non-linear stress-strain, are still unknown. In this study, we tested these biomechanical characteristics of four dermal substitutes, and compared them with those of fresh human skin (FHS). METHODS Materials The four kinds of dermal substitutes used in this study included human dermal matrix with glutaraldehyde (HADM-G, Beijing J.Y Life Tissue Engineering Co., China), swine dermal matrix with glutaraldehyde (SADM-G, Shenzhen Tsinghua Yuanxing Bio-Pharm Co., China), swine dermal matrix (SADM), and goat dermal matrix (GADM, Burns Institute of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, China). With the patients' informed consents and approval from the Institutional Review Board, FHS was obtained from the amputee patients in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Tests The biomechanical characteristics were tested with 4302 dynamometer (Instron Co., USA) at a temperature of 25 °C and a humidity of 50%. Six samples from each kind of dermal substitute were selected for each further test. All the samples were cut into strips of 0.5 cm×2 cm. Tensile strength Both ends of the strips were stretched equally at a speed of 10 mm/min until it was broken. The force that broke the strip was recorded. And then the area of the narrowest cross section was measured, and the tensile strength was calculated by dividing the force by the area. Stress-strain The width and thickness of each strip was measured and then the area of the cross section of the strips was calculated. The strips were stretched at a speed of 10 mm/min until the load reached 3 MPa and then shrunken back at a same speed until the load decreased to zero. The process was repeated 3 times and the hysteresis curve of the strip could be seen disappeared, and the stress-strain curve became stable. Then the process was repeated for another 4 times and the result of stress-strain was recorded when the load was 3 MPa. Stress relaxation Preliminary debugging was necessary during stress relaxing test. In this experiment, stress load was set at 3 MPa, and the loading speed was 125 mm/min. After being relaxed for 10 minutes, relaxing curve of the strip became flat. The percentage of stress decrease was recorded after relaxation. Creep In creep test, loading speed was set at 5 mm/min, and the stress was kept at 3 MPa for 10 minutes until the curve reached stable. Length of the strips was recorded and the ratio of the final length to the original length was calculated. Statistical analysis Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS. RESULTS Tensile strength The tensile resistant force of SADM and GADM was similar to that of FHS, while that of SADM-G and HADM-G was significantly lower and higher respectively than that of the FHS. (Table 1)Table 1: Tensile strength force of four dermal substitutes and FHSStress-strain The strain of SADM and GADM at a load of 3 MPa was similar to that of FHS, while that of SADM-G and HADM-G was significantly higher and lower respectively than that of the FHS, suggesting that the elasticity of HADM-G was the best of the four dermal substitute and that of the SADM-G was the worst. (Table 2)Table 2: Stress-strain of four dermal substitutes and FHSStress relaxation The stress relaxation of SADM and GADM was similar to that of FHS, while the percentage of stress decrease (relaxed for 10 minutes) of SADM-G and HADM-G was higher and lower respectively than that of FHS. (Table 3)Table 3: Stress relaxation of four dermal substitutes and FHSCreep The creep of HADM-G, SADM, and GADM were similar to that of FHS, while that of SADM-G was a little worse than that of FHS. (Table 4)Table 4: Creep of four dermal substitutes and FHSDISCUSSION Adequate intensity and elasticity of skin or skin substitutes are essential and important for protection of wounds and recovery of skin function. Usually, the change of the biomechanical characteristics reflects the breakage of collagen during fabricating process. And the physical characteristics of skin substitutes, especially the intensity, stress-strain, stress relaxation, and creep, are the most important in the reconstruction of skin function after the implantation. Transplantation of dermal substitute may lead to further scar formation, if its collagen is damaged severely. Physical characteristics of dermal substitutes, especially biomechanical characteristics, are not clear yet. Yi3 and Xie4 and their colleagus have studied several skin substitutes biomechanically. However, their results are quite different. According to our results, the intensity and elasticity of SADM and GADM were both similar to those of FHS, while those of SADM-G and HADM-G were the worst and best respectively. Although the differences probably resulted from the differences among the test methods, experimental environments, or reserve techniques, we suggest that SADM and GADM are better choices as dermal substitutes.