Clinical Significance of MGFA Clinical Classification and QMG

Yao Jiang
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the clinical significance of the new classification and quantitative MG (QMG) score published by myasthenia gravis foundation of America (MGFA). Methods: From Nov. 2001 to Mar. 2003, 36 MG patients were classified both with Osserman classification and MGFA clinical classification, the differences between the two classifications were analyzed. The QMG score was also studied before and after thymectomy, as well as its relationship with MGFA classification and therapy-outcome. Results: MGFA type I had the same meaning with Osserman type I, and the patients, assigned to be Osserman type Ia to type IIb were classified into 6 degrees from MGFA type IIa to type IVb, according to QMG examination. The QMG score changed with thymectomy and the time of follow-up, and was correlated with the therapy-outcome. Conclusion: MGFA clinical classification associated with QMG examination is more objective and precise than Osserman classification, and the individual QMG score is accordant with and reflect the outcome after thymectomy. Both MGFA clinical classification and QMG should be widely used in clinical works for deepening the study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?