Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Acetylcholine Infusion and Acetylcholine Bolus Injection Protocols During Invasive Coronary Function Testing
Janneke Woudstra,Rutger G T Feenstra,Caitlin E M Vink,Koen M J Marques,Coen K M Boerhout,Elize A M de Jong,Guus A de Waard,Tim P van de Hoef,Steven A J Chamuleau,Etto C Eringa,Jan J Piek,Yolande Appelman,Marcel A M Beijk,Rutger G.T. Feenstra,Caitlin E.M. Vink,Koen M.J. Marques,Coen K.M. Boerhout,Elize A.M. de Jong,Guus A. de Waard,Tim P. van de Hoef,Steven A.J. Chamuleau,Etto C. Eringa,Jan J. Piek,Marcel A.M. Beijk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.01.038
IF: 3.133
2024-03-04
The American Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are causes of angina with no obstructive coronary arteries in patients. Both can be diagnosed by invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) using acetylcholine (ACh). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a 3-minute ACh infusion as compared with a 1-minute ACh bolus injection protocol in testing CED and CAS. We evaluated 220 consecutive patients with angina with no obstructive coronary arteries who underwent ICFT using continuous Doppler flow measurements. Per protocol, 110 patients were tested using 3-minute infusion, and thereafter 110 patients using 1-minute bolus injections, because of a protocol change. CED was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow or any epicardial vasoconstriction in reaction to low-dose ACh and CAS according to the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) criteria, both with and without T-wave abnormalities, in reaction to high dose ACh. The prevalence of CED was equal in both protocols (78% vs 79%, p = 0.869). Regarding the endotypes of CAS according to COVADIS, the equivocal endotype was diagnosed less often in the 3 vs 1-minute protocol (24% vs 44%, p = 0.004). Including T-wave abnormalities in the COVADIS criteria resulted in a similar diagnostic yield of both protocols. Hemodynamic changes from baseline to the low or high ACh doses were comparable between the protocols for each endotype. In conclusion, ICFT using 3-minute infusion or 1-minute bolus injections of ACh showed a similar diagnostic yield of CED. When using the COVADIS criteria, a difference in the equivocal diagnosis was observed. Including T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion reclassified equivocal test results into CAS and decreased this difference. For clinical practice, we recommend the inclusion of T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion for CAS and the 1-minute bolus protocol for practicality.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems