Abstract:When studying the microbiome using next-generation sequencing, the DNA extraction method, sequencing procedures, and bioinformatic processing are crucial to obtain reliable data. Method choice has been demonstrated to strongly affect the final biological interpretation. We assessed the performance of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines for bacterial microbiota profiling through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, using positive and negative controls for DNA extraction and sequencing and eight different types of high- or low-biomass samples. Performance was evaluated based on quality control passing, DNA yield, richness, diversity, and compositional profiles. All DNA extraction methods retrieved the theoretical relative bacterial abundance with a maximum 3-fold change, although differences were seen between methods, and library preparation and sequencing induced little variation. Bioinformatic pipelines showed different results for observed richness, but diversity and compositional profiles were comparable. DNA extraction methods were successful for feces and oral swabs, and variation induced by DNA extraction methods was lower than intersubject (biological) variation. For low-biomass samples, a mixture of genera present in negative controls and sample-specific genera, possibly representing biological signal, were observed. We conclude that the tested bioinformatic pipelines perform equally, with pipeline-specific advantages and disadvantages. Two out of three extraction methods performed equally well, while one method was less accurate regarding retrieval of compositional profiles. Lastly, we again demonstrate the importance of including negative controls when analyzing low-bacterial-biomass samples. IMPORTANCE Method choice throughout the workflow of a microbiome study, from sample collection to DNA extraction and sequencing procedures, can greatly affect results. This study evaluated three different DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines by including positive and negative controls and various biological specimens. By identifying an optimal combination of DNA extraction method and bioinformatic pipeline use, we hope to contribute to increased methodological consistency in microbiota studies. Our methods were applied not only to commonly studied samples for microbiota analysis, e.g., feces, but also to more rarely studied, low-biomass samples. Microbiota composition profiles of low-biomass samples (e.g., urine and tumor biopsy specimens) were not always distinguishable from negative controls, or showed partial overlap, confirming the importance of including negative controls in microbiota studies, especially when low bacterial biomass is expected.

Comparison of Two Methods for Total DNA Extraction and Analysis of Intestinal Microflora in Eupolyphaga sinesis by ERIC-PCR Fingerprint

An Effective Method for Isolation of DNA from Pig Faeces and Comparison of Five Different Methods.

Identification of Enterococcus sp. from midgut of silkworm based on biochemical and 16S rDNA sequencing analysis

Identification of Enterococcus mundtii Isolated From the Intestine of the Silkworm,Bombyx mori

RAPD Analysis of the Enterococci Isolated from the Silkworm,Bombyx Mori

Analysis of the Intestinal Bacterial Communities in Wild Scylla Serrata from Different Districts by PCR-DGGE

A Comparison of Three Protocols for the Extraction of Total Fecal DNA

Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis

Comparation of Three Methods for Studying Microbial Diversity of Farmland Soil

Cloning and Sequence Analysis of the ITS and 5.8S Rdna of Eustrongylides Spp.isolates from Monopterus Albus

A rapid method for total DNA extraction from microorganisms of intestinal tract

The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Optimising Bacterial DNA Extraction from Faecal Samples: Comparison of Three Methods

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for PCR-DGGE Analysis of the Soil Bacterial Community

Intestinal microbiota structure of diet-induced obesity rats and its specific molecular marker

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction

Comparative Research of Three Different Methods of Extraction of ETEC F18 Fimbriae from Pigs

Comparison of DNA extraction methods on different sample matrices within the same terrestrial ecosystem

Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types

Toward Standards in Clinical Microbiota Studies: Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods and Two Bioinformatic Pipelines

Comparative evaluation of a new magnetic bead-based DNA extraction method from fecal samples for downstream next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing