Surveillance for distribution and resistance of 10 992 Acinetobacter spp.Isolates in Shanghai, 1995-2003

陈章景,朱德姝,张婴元,胡付品,吴湜,汪复
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1009-7708.2004.03.001
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the distribution and susceptibility of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. in eleven Shanghai hospitals. Methods:Retrospectively analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates from 1st January 1995 to 31st December 2003 which were tested by Kirby-Bauer method. Results:There were 10 992 Acinetobacter spp. clinical isolates in these 9 year, and 90.3% of them were isolated from hospitalized patients while 9.7% from outpatient subjects. The ratio of Acinetobacter spp. to nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli was 35%-37%. In Acinetobacter spp., 72.3%-78.6% isolates were A. baumanii. Results of susceptibility test showed that imipenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam, and ampicillin-sulbactam were the most active antibiotics against Acinetobacter spp., and the resistance rates were 1.2%-10.4%, 2.7%-9.0%, and 6.7%-25.0% respectively. Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to all the other tested antimicrobials and the rates varied with the species. Generally, A. baumannii was more resistant than A. lwoffii and the others. Conclusions:Acinetobacter spp. was one of the most important gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli. Imipenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam, and ampicillin-sulbactam were the most active agents against these bacteria, and could be used to resolve the infection according to the clinical patterns. Other antimicrobials had lower activity should be used on the result of susceptibility test.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?