Study of evaluation and intervention of quality of life in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

蒋崇慧,邓普珍,谢钢,张延锋,杨光田,侯德仁,杨期东
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1671-0282.2003.07.005
IF: 1.473
2003-01-01
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Objective To explore the methods on evaluation of life quality in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) and compare the difference of the neurological functional status and life quality in Anisodamine(Ani.)group and control group. Methods The questionnaires of glasgow coma scale(GCS),neurological functional insufficiency(NFI),general quality of life inventory(GQOLI) were employed to evaluate the neuroloyed functional status and life quality who were managed with CPR successfully,and at the same time,the effects of large quantity of Ani were observed.Results The patients who were successfully resuscitated by CPR reported significant lower scores on quality of life than controls in dimensions of physical health,psychological health and social function.7 days after CPR,the score of GCS was higher in the Ani group of than that of control group.3 months and 6 months after CPR,the score of NFI was lower in Ani group that of control group,the scores of quality of life in physical health and cognitive function were higher in Ani than that of control groups.Conclusion The quality of life is obviously decreased after CPR.The neurological functional status and quality of life in patients after CPR were improved partly by large quantity of Ani.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?