Multi-center clinical trial on the treatment of acute pancreatitis by ulinastatin

collaboration Shanghai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-1432.2001.05.011
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the effectiveness of ulinastatin in the treatment of patients with acute edematic pancreatitis(AEP) and acute hemorragic and necrotic pancreatitis(AHNP). Methods Multi center randomized clinical trial was performed. Patients were randomly alloccated into the treatment group(with ulinastatin) and control group(with cabexate or sandostatin) which were stratified by AHNP or AEP. Clinical symptoms and signs were scored as none,mild,moderate and severe. Laboratory tests were included as serum amylase,liver function,blood RT,FBG,Ca 2+ , renal function, blood pH and SaO 2. Clinical results were assessed as cured,significant effective, effective and non effective. All the side effects were recorded during the whole process. Results From April 2000 to July 2000,totally 94 acute pancreatitis patients were enrolled (male 50,female 40). Among them,68 cases were mild,26 cases were severe. The study showed that total effectiveness of ulinastatin in treating acute pancreatitis was 100%,while the cured rate was 83.3%,a little bit higher than control group with cabexate(71.4%),but no statistical significance existed. Clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain,fullness almost disappeared within 3~5 days. Total effectiveness of ulinastatin in treating AHNP was similar as that of sandostatin(78.6% vs 81.9%, P =0.840). The main complication after treating AHNP was pancreatic pseudocyst. Only one case showed increase of ALT. No side effects of hypersensitivity,skin rash,WBC decrease were noted. Safety had been proved by monitoring of liver and renal function,eletrolytes and blood RT. Conclusions Ulinastatin showed effectiveness in treating AEP and AHNP with fewer side effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?