Abstract:Background: Cost is always a big issue for dialysis patients. In the present study, we analyzed the effect of different payment schemes on dialysis adequacy and clinical outcome in our peritoneal dialysis program.Methods: This is a single-center cohort study. A total of 175 patients who began dialysis from January 2006 to December 2007 were included. Baseline data, including volume status, dietary intake and nutrition status, dialysis adequacy, and sodium removal were collected at 6 months after peritoneal dialysis. Based on the different payment schemes, the patients were divided into 2 groups, higher payment group (GHP, 130 cases, with more than 85% reimbursement), and lower payment group (GLP, 45 cases, with less than 50% payment or totally self-paid). Patients were followed up until dropout or until December 31, 2013.Results: At baseline, patients in the 2 groups had nearly the same residual renal function. But the GLP group patients dialyzed at a lower dose (4,516.91 +/- 1,768.20 mL vs 6,058.17 +/- 2,013.43 mL, p < 0.001). They had lower creatinine clearance (51.64 +/- 24.23 L/w vs 70.54 +/- 30.27 L/w, p < 0.001), sodium removal (2.23 +/- 1.29g vs 2.77 +/- 1.29g, p = 0.027), and fluid removal (970.33 +/- 545.97 mL vs 1,146.66 +/- 460.93 mL, p = 0.038). Normalized by height (in meters), the GLP group patients still had a lower normalized dialysis dose (2,890.61 +/- 1084.44 mL/m vs 3,761.34 +/- 1,237.10 mL/m, p < 0.001). Baseline nutritional and dietary parameters were comparable except that a lower daily protein intake (42.73 +/- 10.99 g vs 47.26 +/- 14.30 g, p = 0.032) and higher serum urea level (23.43 +/- 6.88 mmol/L vs 19.84 +/- 5.92 mmol/L, p < 0.001) were presented in the GLP group. There was no difference in volume status. During the follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in patient survival and technique survival. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for related factors, payment was again not a strong predictor of survival in the study population.Conclusion: Our study found that GLP group patients were adherent to lifestyle modification with lower dialysis doses, and they also had nearly the same long-term clinical outcome as the GHP group patients. Thus, lower dialysis doses combined with controlled dietary intake may be an effective approach to solve the dialysis problem for the low socio-economic status (SES) population.

Outline of a health economic study of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Comparative Study on Expenditure and Their Effect of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Prognosis of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease: A Meta-analysis.

Equity of Use of Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in China

Economic Evaluation of Three Dialysis Methods in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease in China.

Evaluation Studies on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis for ESRD Patients

Current pattern of Chinese dialysis units: a cohort study in a representative sample of units.

Impact of Initial Dialysis Modality on the Survival of Patients with ESRD in Eastern China: a Propensity-Matched Study.

Influence of Different Payment Schemes on the Clinical Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

PUK4 Total Economic Burden of Both Peritoneal Dialysis and Renal Anemia Treatment

Impact of Individual and Environmental Socioeconomic Status on Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

SAT-294 the Relationship Between Peritoneal Dialysis Mortality and the Chinese Medical Insurance

An analysis of the etiologies and economic indexes of inpatients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease in North China

Comparison of survival in patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Comparison of Hospitalization Cause and Risk Factors Between Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

A Comparison of US Medicare Expenditures for Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

The Distribution and Influence Factors of Medical Expenditure in Peritoneal Dialysis Out-patients

THE EFFECT OF AUTOMATED VERSUS CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS ON MORTALITY RISK IN CHINA.

RETRACTION: the Relationship Between Hemodialysis Mortality and the Chinese Medical Insurance Type (retraction Article) (retraction of Vol 41, 2019)

Comparison of Quality of Life and Causes of Hospitalization Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in China