MR diagnosis of hemifacial spasm and trigeminal neuralgia

沈加林,华佳,许建荣,张晓华,李善泉,罗其中
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2003.07.017
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the MR findings and diagnostic value of neurovascular compression in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) and trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Methods MR manifestations and operative results of 120 patients with hemifacial spasm and trigeminal neuralgia were reviewed retrospectively. Results (1) 58 sides had vascular compression or contact at MR imaging in 126 sides of the facial nerves of 63 patients with hemifacial spasm, and 17 sides had uncertain vascular contact. 45 sides had vascular compression or contact at MR imaging in 114 sides of the trigeminal nerves of 57 patients with trigeminal neuralgia, and 12 sides had uncertain vascular contact. (2) Statistical results: The difference between the symptomatic sides and asymptomatic sides in HFS patients was statistically significant (χ 2=31.66, P 0.001). The difference between the symptomatic sides and asymptomatic sides in TN patients was statistically significant (χ 2=42.98, P 0.001). (3) The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive likelihood ratio of MR diagnosis of vascular compression or contact was 94%, 83%, and 1.88, respectively. Conclusion MR had higher specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing neurovascular compression or contact, and it played an important role in demonstrating the relationship between the cisternal portion of the seventh and fifth cranial nerve and surrounding vascular structures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?