Abstract:<span>Reason and emotion are often cast as opposites. Yet emotion comes in a wide array of manifestations and has a variety of relations with its supposed opposite. Understanding emotion better is key to grasping how jurisprudence casts the relation between psychology and judicial decision making. Jurisprudents disagree on whether and when (lack of) emotion is a problem for decision makers in the justice system. The aim of this paper is to shed light on unarticulated assumptions in mainstream legal theory concerning this disagreement. The paper plots the different positions jurisprudents hold concerning the role of emotion in judicial decision making, regardless of where they stand on matters such the nature of law. The paper substantiates the claim that legal theorists often take an irrationalist approach to emotion but occasionally develop an alternative account that is closer to a cognitivist approach, the prime example of which is the claim that equity requires practical reasoning. Emotions are then cast as skills to be appreciated. The paper concludes that jurisprudence adopts a simplistic view of emotion. The study of the role of emotion has been hampered by the tendency to view emotions reductively. My classificatory effort warrants the conclusion that lack of emotion – understood as a skill in cognitivist terms – constitutes a problem for justice.</span>

On the Emotion of Judges in the Process of Conviction and Weighing of Punishment

Mode of the Judge Thinking

On the Influence of Judges' Feeling Factors in Criminal Trail

The Role of Emotion and Motivation in Jury Decision-Making

How to Cognize by Judge: under the “Second-Order Theory”,and Negotiate with Professor Yan Chaoxiu

From Cognitive Thinking to Feeling Thinking:A Study on the Procedure of Judgment Thinking

An In-depth Analysis of a Judge's Trial Thinking

Law and Emotion: How Empathy Forms the Judges' Sense of Justice

Regulation of Judges’ Humanity

When is lack of emotion a problem for justice? Four views on legal decision makers’ emotive life

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

How to judge emotions? Measuring moral emotions of lawyers in a retrospective situation

Rule by Law, Emotion and Conscience

A Study on Main Factors Influencing the Psychological State of the Marking Judges in Sports Events with High Difficulty and Aesthetic Value

Introduction: The Challenge of Uncovering and Using Emotions in Criminal Justice

On Value Evaluation in the Criminal Adjudication

The Role of Emotion in Moral Judgment: Evidence from Cognitive Neuroscience

Analysis of the Judicial Punishment:A Law and Economic Approach

On the Concept of Measurement of Punishments

Chinese Criminal Justice in the Vision of the Criminal Policy of Tempering Justice with Mercy