Evaluation of perennial and annual cool-season forage grass varieties

何亚丽,陈丽娟,袁晓君,王欢欢,胡雪华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2004.08.006
2004-01-01
Abstract:cultivars of perennial and annual cool-season forage grasses were evaluated for fresh and dry grass yield, crude protein content, and salinity tolerance in the field and lab experiments in Shanghai 2000 through 2002. Results showed that, seeding in autumn resulted in high dried forage grass yield over 6 t/hm~2 at the first harvesting in next early spring for Tetila (G16), Grazer (G38) and Total (G41); Seeding in early spring resulted in high dried forage grass yield above 8.6 t/hm~2 at the harvest in early June for FaGrow (G30),97-3 (G23), Tetila (G16) and Tatragold (G18); Salinity tolerant varieties were Tatragold (G18), Minaret (G37) and Shangnong Tetraploid rye grass (G45) that could germinate and grow well in 0.6 %NaCl in Hoagland's solution; 9724 (G22) and Tetila (G16) had over or close to 10 % crude protein content of the dry matter; Tatragold (G18) and Shangnong Tatroploid rye grass (G45) obtained above 0.3 weight ratio of dry matter to fresh grass. General evaluation of the traits showed that,9724 (G22), Tatragold (G18), Tetila ( G164), FaGrow (G30) and Total (G41),were the top 5 varieties among the 46 cultivars tested, which are recommended to be grown in Shanghai and surrounding areas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?