Abstract:Transplantation of encapsulated living cells is a promising approach for the treatment of a wide variety of diseases, especially diabetes. Range-scale application of the technique, however, is hampered by insufficient stability of the capsules. It is difficult to find the optimal membrane to meet all the properties required for cell transplantation. To overcome these difficulties, it is necessary to compare characteristics such as mechanical strength, cell proliferation and biocompatibility of different membranes. We prepared Ca-alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate (APA) and Ba-alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate (BPA) microcapsules using the electrostatic droplet method. The integrity of the microcapsules was measured by suspending them in a saline buffer and shaking at 150 rpm for 48 h. The microcapsules were cultured in simulated body fluid to analyze the osmotic pressure stability and implanted in the leg muscle pouch of SD rats to test in vivo transplantation stability. The microcapsules were implanted in the intraperitoneal cavity; then the biocompatibility of microcapsules was identified through analyzing fibrosis formation of microcapsules. The proliferation of cells (Cos-7 and HL-60) cultured in the microcapsules was measured by MTT assay. After 48 h shaking at 150 rpm, the percentages of intact microcapsules of BPA and APA microcapsules were 98.5 +/- 0.248% and 95.7 +/- 0.221% (p < 0.05), respectively. The intact percentages of APA and BPA microcapsules were 96.9% and 97.7%, respectively, after being soaked in SBF at 37 degrees C for 15 days. The empty APA and BPA microcapsules were not adhered to the muscle and there was light cellular overgrowth. There is no difference on biocompatibility in implantation into peritoneal cavities. After the cells were cultured in microcapsules, A(490nm) of the 8th week was significantly higher than that of 1 day, and the 4th week was at the peak of the cell proliferation curve. After culture for 2 to 6 weeks, spheroids started to develop gradually within the beads. The mechanical strength of BPA microcapsules was higher than that of APA microcapsules. However, there was no difference between the two kinds of capsules in biocompatibility. Microencapsulation did not affect cell proliferation or increase the quantity of cells. In conclusion, BPA microcapsules were more suitable for transplantation in vivo.

Advances in Transplatation of Microencapsulated Tissues and Cells

Development of Transplantation of Microencapsulated Genetically Eengineered Cells

Research progress of the cell microencapsulation

Materials and Fabricating Methods of Microcapsules for Cell Transplantation

Challenges and Advancements of Alginate-Based Encapsulated Artificial Cells

The advance and limitation of microencapsulated grafts transplantation]

Problems and solutions of microencapsulated islet transplantation

Physio-chemical progress and clinical application of microencapsulated hepatocytes

Design a Chemically Defined/medically Approved Medium for Celltransplantation According to the Metabolic Characteristics of Microencapsulated Cells and the Process of Encapsulation

Application and progress of microencapsulation technology in medical field

Study on solidity biocompatibility and permeability of immune isolation microenc apsule

Advances in Single Mammalian Cells Encapsulation Technologies

Development of microencapsulated islet transplantation

Investigating Design Principles of Micropatterned Encapsulation Systems Containing High-Density Microtissue Arrays

Update on cellular encapsulation

Structure characterization and bioactivity of chitosan cell microencapsule

Comparison of Two Types of Alginate Microcapsules on Stability and Biocompatibility in Vitro and in Vivo

A Pro‐Angiogenic Immunoprotective Membrane for Cell Therapies

Recent Development in Cell Encapsulations and Their Therapeutic Applications

Application of microcapsulated artificial cell technique

Hydrogel-Bondable Asymmetric Planar Membranes with Hierarchical Pore Structures for Cell Scaffolding and Encapsulation.