A Historian's Ethical Burden: The Rhetorical Mechanism of Chen Yuan's Historical Writings in Occupied Peiping
Yuan Yidan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16837/j.cnki.1002-0039.2013.02.007
2013-01-01
Abstract:After the Marco Bolo Bridge Incident in 1937,Chen Yuan ( 陳 垣) ,the historian who stranded at Peiping,was much concerned by the Chinese intellectual community. His further act, that is, the possibility of choosing stay or leave,resistance or cooperation in the shade of Japan's occupation,was regarded as not merely a personal behavior but also a symbol concerning intellectuals' ethics. Based on a close reading of Chen Yuan's historical writings during the occupied period, this paper intends to analysis their internal rhetoric mechanism. What interests me is the inner world of the famous patriotic historian,rather than the detailed historical questions which he dealt with. The salient rhetorical feature of Chen's works during the wartime could be defined as a mechanism of "Biaowei " ( 表微, literally means "to clarify the ambiguous meaning ") ,that is,the historian often cites historical facts to verify his attitudes and feelings in the contemporary context. From the historical experiences of the replacement of dynasties in Chinese history,Chen tried to find similar roles and facts to support his political attitude and moral judgment in the reality of the occupation. However,instead of historical facts,the legalities to connect the present to the past were built on the reality situations and the ethical dilemma of the historical writer. The mechanism of "Biaowei"could be considered as the inner structure of Chen Yuan's rhetorical strategies in his historical writings during this period.