Effects of Pulmonary Surfactant on Lung Inflammation in Rats with Endotoxin Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

朱光发,张国清,郭海英,张旻,周新
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6205.2002.04.005
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To examine effects of a porcine pulmonary surfactant (PS) on lung inflammation in experimental rat model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) .Methods Thirty-two healthy male adult Sprague-Dawley rats were surgical operated and mechanically ventilated with 50% oxygen (FiQ2).8 animais received no endotoxin were served as healthy control group (H) .24 animals were adminstered 50 nig/ kg of endotoxin intratrachaeally to induce ARDS. When arterial hlood O2 (PaO2) / FiO2≤300 mm Hg.the animals were randomly allocated to 3 groups ( H = 8 each): ARDS model group (M) not receiving PS, immediate ( i.e.early stage) treatment with PS at a dose of 100 mg/kg (E)administered intratrachaeally, late stage(when PaO2;/FiO2≤200 mm Hg,approximately 2 h later) treatment with PS used as E group(L) ,and were ventilated for another 6 h. Total while blood cells (WBC) were counted and the contents of total proteins(TP) ,TNF-α, IL-1β,microphage inflammatory protein 2 (M1P-2) in BALF and MDA,SOD,GSH levels in the lung homogenates were assayed,respectively . Lung histological changes were examined under a light microscope. Results The M group had increased WBC,TP,TNF-α, IL-1β,MIP-2 in BALF, increased MDA,and decreased SOD and GSH in the lung homogenate (all P0.01) as compared with the H group, whereas TP, IL-1β,MIP-2, MDA and SOD in the L group were modestly but statistically significant improved (P0.05 or P0.01) as compared with the M group,and the E group showed further improvement of all measurements above ( P 0.05 or P0.01) as compared with the M group and the L group. Hislological examination revealed severe acute lung injury in the M group,both L group and E group showed less severe than M group,but it was lighter in the E group than the L group.Conclusion Exogenous PS is more effective in reducing lung inflammation and attenuating lung injury when it is used at the early stage of ARDS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?