Microwave assisted chemical bath deposition of CdS on TiO2 film for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells
Guang Zhu,Likun Pan,Tao Xu,Zhuo Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.05.018
IF: 4.598
2011-01-01
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Abstract:A simple, rapid and effective method of microwave assisted chemical bath deposition (MACBD) has been used to deposit CdS quantum dots on the surface of TiO 2 film as photoanode of quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. The photovoltaic performance of the as-prepared cell is investigated. The results show that the cell based on MACBD deposited TiO 2 /CdS electrode achieves an improved short circuit current density of 6.69 mA cm −2 and power conversion efficiency of 1.03% at one sun (AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm −2 ) as compared with the one employing conventional sequential chemical bath deposition method. Keywords Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells CdS TiO 2 Microwave assisted chemical bath deposition 1 Introduction Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) are considered as a promising candidate for the development of next generation solar cells because they can be fabricated by simple and low-cost techniques [1–6] . The development of nanotechnology, especially the synthesis and application of nanomaterials [7,8] , facilitates the progress of QDSSCs and enables them to receive more and more interests. QDSSCs are based on the photosensitization of semiconductor photoanode, typically TiO 2 , by quantum dot (QD) sensitizers, typically CdS or CdSe. Their working mechanism is depicted in Fig. 1 involving key processes (1)–(7). In brief, electrons, excited from valance band (VB) to conduction band (CB) of QDs by absorbing light (path (1)), are rapidly injected into the CB of TiO 2 particles (path (2)) and then transported to F-doped SnO 2 (FTO) (path (3)). The oxidized CdS QDs are regenerated by accepting the electrons from counter electrode (CE) (path (5)) via redox pair (path (4)). However, the charge recombination (paths (6) and (7)) will happen in the meantime and deteriorate the cell performance. Therefore, the improvement of the performance of QDs and their interconnectivity with TiO 2 substrate will facilitate the electron transfer from QDs to TiO 2 and decrease the back transport electrons from TiO 2 to electrolyte, which is very important to the cell efficiency. In general, the QDs are attached onto the semiconductor films using three common methods such as self-assembled monolayer, sequential chemical bath deposition (SCBD) and electrochemical deposition [9–11] . Many studies have also devoted to explore other fabrication techniques to attach QDs to TiO 2 . Smith et al. [12] employed electrophoretic method to deposit CdSe QDs onto TiO 2 film and obtained photovoltaic response with an efficiency of about 10 −6 %. Recently, Gao et al. [13] studied a close space sublimation technique in which CdS powder was heated at 500 °C in a furnace with Ar or Ar/H 2 gas flow to form CdS nanoparticles onto the surface of TiO 2 for QDSSCs. Lee et al. [14] reported that QDSSCs based on CdS coated TiO 2 electrodes using spray pyrolysis deposition method showed a power conversion efficiency of 1.84% in I - / I 3 - electrolyte and 0.87% in polysulfide electrolyte. As an inexpensive, rapid, clean, versatile technique, microwave irradiation induces interaction of the dipole moment of polar molecules or molecular ionic aggregates with alternating electronic and magnetic fields, causing molecular-level heating which leads to homogeneous and quick thermal reactions [15–17] . However, the deposition of CdS QDs onto the surface of TiO 2 electrode using microwave technique is hardly reported in the literatures although such a method has been used successfully to synthesize CdS QDs, nanowires and nanotubes [18–20] . In this work, we report sensitized-type solar cells based on TiO 2 photoanode and CdS QDs as sensitizers, in which CdS QDs are prepared using microwave assisted chemical bath deposition (MACBD) method. MACBD can synthesize rapidly CdS QDs and control precisely their sizes with a narrow distribution, which can avoid the repetitive immersing operation required in conventional SCBD method. The as-synthesized cell shows a high short-circuit current density of 6.69 mA cm −2 and conversion efficiency of 1.03% under one sun illumination as compared with the cell fabricated using SCBD method. 2 Experimental TiO 2 electrode was prepared by screen printing of TiO 2 paste [21] on FTO (resistivity: 14 Ω/□, Nippon Sheet Glass, Japan). The electrode configuration was a transparent layer of nanocrystalline TiO 2 (P25, Degussa) with a mean size of 25 nm and a scattering layer microcrystalline TiO 2 with a mean size of 200 nm (Dalian Hepta Chroma Solar Tech Co., Ltd.). The as-prepared electrodes were sintered at 500 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, CdS sensitizer was deposited on the mesoporous TiO 2 electrodes by MACBD technique using a precursor aqueous solution of 0.025 M CdCl 2 and 0.025 M CH 4 N 2 S (Sinopharm Chemical Reagents Co. Ltd.). The TiO 2 electrode was immersed into a sealed vessel with precursor aqueous solution, and then the vessel was put into an automated focused microwave system (Explorer-48, CEM Co.) and treated at 150 °C with a microwave irradiation power of 100 W. In this work, TiO 2 /CdS films with different deposition time of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 min are named as electrodes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. In this work, in order to compare the performances of QDSSCs fabricated using other method, CdS QDs are also deposited on the TiO 2 film by traditional SCBD method [22,23] . In brief, TiO 2 film was dipped into an ethanol solution containing 0.5 M Cd(NO 3 ) 2 for 30 s, rinsed with ethanol, and then dipped for another 30 s into a 0.5 M Na 2 S methanol solution and rinsed again with methanol. The two-step dipping procedure was considered to be one cycle. This sequential coating was repeated for several cycles. The CdS QDSSCs were sealed in a sandwich structure with a 25 m spacer (Surlyn) by using thin Au-sputtered FTO glass as counter electrode. Water/methanol (3:7 by volume) solution was used as a co-solvent of the polysulfide electrolyte. Electrolyte solution consists of 0.5 M Na 2 S, 2 M S, and 0.2 M KCl [24] . The active area of the cell is 0.2 cm 2 . Photocurrent–voltage measurement was performed with a Keithley model 2440 Source Meter and a Newport solar simulator system (equipped with a 1 kW xenon arc lamp, Oriel) at one sun (AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm 2 ). Incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) was measured as a function of wavelength from 300 to 800 nm using an Oriel 300 W xenon arc lamp and a lock-in amplifier M 70104 (Oriel) under monochromator illumination. 3 Results and discussion The morphology and structure of the electrodes were characterized by using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). The cross section FESEM image in Fig. 2 a shows that as-prepared TiO 2 electrode is composed of a 10 μm thick compact P25 transparent layer and a 3 μm thick loose microcrystalline TiO 2 scattering layer. Such a double-layer structure favors the contact between the substrate and electrode and enhances the light scattering ability, which can improve the performance of the cells [25] . Fig. 2 b shows the top view images of TiO 2 film by FESEM. The TiO 2 electrode is constructed by a random agglomeration of TiO 2 particles. The porous structure of TiO 2 favors an easy penetration of electrolyte, as well as Cd and S precursors, during deposition. Fig. 2 c shows the FESEM image (top view) of electrode 4. Compared with bare TiO 2 electrode ( Fig. 2 b), an apparent difference in the surface morphology is observed. The composition of TiO 2 /CdS electrode 4 was identified by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) measurement, as shown in Fig. 2 d. Quantitative analysis of the EDX spectrum gives a Cd:S atomic ratio of about 1, indicating that high-grade CdS particles are formed. This result indicates that a great amount of CdS QDs is assembled on the surface of TiO 2 film via MACBD. Fig. 3 shows the UV–vis absorption spectra (Hitachi U-3900 spectrophotometer) of electrodes 1–5. Compared with the absorption spectrum of pure TiO 2 film (electrode 1), there is an obvious absorption peak near 500 nm for TiO 2 /CdS electrode, which is ascribed to the contribution from CdS QDs. The band gap of CdS QDs corresponding to the absorption edge is about 2.38 eV. The absorbance gradually increases with the increase of the deposition time, indicating that more CdS QDs have been deposited onto the TiO 2 film. The J – V curves of CdS QDSSCs with different electrodes 1–5 are shown in Fig. 4 . The open circuit potential ( V oc ), short circuit current density ( J sc ), fill factor (FF) and conversion efficiency ( η ) of all cells are listed in Table 1 . The I sc and V oc of the cell with electrode 1 are 0.57 mA cm −2 and 0.20 V, respectively, resulting in a very low value of energy conversion efficiency of 0.06%. When the deposition time is prolonged, J sc , V oc and η increase obviously and reach maximum values of 6.69 mA cm −2 , 0.41 V and 1.03% at a deposition time of 30 min, respectively, and then decrease with a further increase of the deposition time. At the beginning of the deposition, the MACBD process is supposed to increase the coverage ratio of CdS on the surface of TiO 2 by replenishing the uncovered area and the thickness of CdS layer increases with the increase of the deposition time. Such increment of CdS loading leads to more excited electrons under the illumination of light, which is advantageous to the photocurrent. An optimized thickness of CdS layer is obtained at a deposition time of 30 min, which results in a highest J sc and η by providing a good interfacial structure between TiO 2 and CdS films and reducing the recombination of the injected electrons from TiO 2 to the electrolyte due to a well-covered CdS on the TiO 2 surface. However, as the thickness of CdS layer further increases, it will be more difficult to transport an electron from the CdS outer layer into the TiO 2 film. In the meantime, the CdS/electrolyte contacting area will decrease with the increase of the CdS amount because more pores are probably blocked by the additional loading of CdS, leading to unfavorable electron transportation at TiO 2 /CdS/electrolyte interface [26,27] . Fig. 5 displays the current density–voltage ( J – V ) curves of QDSSCs based on pure TiO 2 electrode and TiO 2 /CdS electrodes fabricated by MACBD and SCBD (for comparison) methods, respectively. It can be observed that the cell with electrode 4 using MACBD method exhibits a short-circuit current density ( J SC ) of 6.69 mA cm −2 , an open-circuit voltage ( V OC ) of 0.41 V, a fill factor (FF) of 0.38 and a power conversion efficiency ( η ) of 1.03%, while the corresponding values for the cell using SCBD method are J SC = 3.75 mA cm −2 , V OC = 0.44 V, FF = 0.43, and η = 0.71%. The higher η and J SC shows that MACBD is a competitive fabrication technique to attach QDs to TiO 2 for QDSSCs as compared with SCBD, which can be further confirmed by the IPCE curves of the two cells in the inset of Fig. 5 . The cell using MACBD method achieves an IPCE value of maximum 35% at 450 nm, while for the cell using SCBD method, the peak reaches 21% only. The higher J SC and η for the cell using MACBD method should be ascribed to the following reasons: (i) Microwave irradiation can heat up the aqueous solution homogeneously and fast due to the penetration characteristic of microwaves and high utilization factor of microwave energy [28] . Therefore, the nucleation and growth of CdS QDs can be finished in an extremely short period of time, which is extraordinarily beneficial for reducing the concentration of surface defects of QDs [29] . The carrier recombination at surface defects of QDs is correspondingly suppressed and thus the cell performance is increased [30] . (ii) It is known that microwave irradiation has been used to prepare the hydrophilic nanoparticles [31] or to improve the surface wettability of polymer by increasing surface free energy [32] . Therefore, easy attachment of CdS onto TiO 2 film and good contact between them due to the improvement of surface hydrophilicity of TiO 2 film may contribute to the increase of J SC and η [33] . In order to confirm the influence of microwave treatment on the surface wettability of TiO 2 film, the contact angel (CA) of the TiO 2 film were measured with a 5 μl droplet of CdS precursor aqueous solution at ambient temperature (25 °C) using an optical contact angle meter (Powereach, JC2000D3, Shanghai Zhongchen Co. Ltd.), and the result is shown in Fig. 6 . It is observed that the CA obviously changes from 27° to 14° after microwave treatment, indicating the improvement of surface hydrophilicity of TiO 2 film. Such an improvement may be due to the enhancement of surface free energy due to heat treatment under microwave irradiation [32] . Therefore, MACBD has shown to be an efficient method to attach CdS onto TiO 2 for QDSSCs. 4 Conclusions In summary, we have demonstrated a simple, rapid and effective MACBD method to deposit CdS on TiO 2 film as photoanode for QDSSCs. This method can synthesize CdS QDs rapidly and form good contact between CdS and TiO 2 film. A improvement of short-circuit current density and power conversion efficiency have been achieved by using MACBD method as compared with conventional SCBD method, which enables MACBD to be a promising fabrication technique for QDSSCs. Acknowledgment This work was supported by Special Project for Nanotechnology of Shanghai (No. 0952nm02200 ). References [1] Y.L. Lee Y.S. Lo Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 2009 604 [2] P. Sudhagar J.H. Jung S. Park R. Sathyamoorthy H. Ahn Y.S. Kang Electrochim. Acta 55 2009 113 [3] E.M. Barea M. Shalom S. Gimenez I. Hod I. Mora-Sero A. Zaban J. Bisquert J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 2010 6834 [4] X.X. Ren G.L. Zhao H. Li W. Wu G.R. Han J. Alloys Compd. 465 2008 534 [5] H. Chen W.Y. Fu H.B. Yang P. Sun Y.Y. Zhang L.R. Wang W.Y. Zhao X.M. Zhou H. Zhao Q. Jing X.F. Qi Y.X. Li Electrochim. Acta 56 2010 919 [6] G. Zhu T. Lv L.K. Pan Z. Sun C.Q. Sun J. Alloys Compd. 509 2011 362 [7] J. Chen D.W. Zhao J.L. Song X.W. Sun W.Q. Deng X.W. Liu W. Lei Electrochem. Commun. 11 2009 2265 [8] D. Du W.J. Chen J. Cai J. Zhang F.G. Qu H.B. Li J. Electroanal. Chem. 623 2008 81 [9] I. Mora-Sero S. Gimenez T. Moehl F. Fabregat-Santiago T.L. Villareal R. Gomez J. Bisquert Nanotechnology 19 2008 424007 [10] C.H. Chang Y.L. Lee Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 2007 053503 [11] S. Banerjee S.K. Mohapatra P.P. Das M. Misra Chem. Mater. 20 2008 6784 [12] N.J. Smith K.J. Emmett S.J. Rosenthal Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 2008 043504 [13] X.F. Gao W.T. Sun Z.D. Hu G. Ai Y.L. Zhang S. Feng F. Li L.M. Peng J. Phys. Chem. C 113 2009 20481 [14] Y.H. Lee S.H. Im J.H. Rhee J.H. Lee S.I. Seok ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2 2010 1648 [15] H. Xu S.J. Xing L.P. Zeng Y.Z. Xian G.Y. Shi L.T. Jin J. Electroanal. Chem. 625 2009 53 [16] X.M. Xiao J. Sakamoto M. Tanabe S. Yamazaki S. Yamabe T. Matsumura-Inoue J. Electroanal. Chem. 527 2002 33 [17] J.A. Gerbec D. Magana A. Washington G.F. Strouse J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 2005 15791 [18] Y. Wada H. Kuramoto J. Anand T. Kitamura T. Sakata H. Mori S. Yanagida J. Mater. Chem. 11 2001 1936 [19] J. He X.N. Zhao J.J. Zhu J. Wang J. Cryst. Growth 240 2002 389 [20] M.W. Shao F. Xu Y.Y. Peng J. Wu Q. Li S.Y. Zhang Y.T. Qian New J. Chem. 26 2002 1440 [21] S. Ito P. Chen P. Comte M.K. Nazeeruddin P. Liska P. Pechy M. Grätzel Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 15 2007 603 [22] G. Zhu F.F. Su T. Lv L.K. Pan Z. Sun Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5 2010 1749 [23] G. Zhu T. Xu T. Lv L.K. Pan Q.F. Zhao Z. Sun J. Electroanal. Chem. 650 2011 248 [24] Y.L. Lee C.H. Chang J. Power Sources 185 2008 584 [25] V.G. Pedro X.Q. Xu I. Mora-Sero J. Bisquert ACS Nano 4 2010 5783 [26] S.C. Lin Y.L. Lee C.H. Chang Y.J. Shen Y.M. Yang Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 2007 143517 [27] Q.X. Zhang Y.D. Zhang S.Q. Huang X.M. Huang Y.H. Luo Q.B. Meng D.M. Li Electrochem. Commun. 21 2010 327 [28] S. Komarneni D. Li B. Newalkar H. Katsuki A.S. Bhalla Langmuir 18 2002 5959 [29] H. Zhang L. Wang H. Xiong L. Hu B. Yang W. Li Adv. Mater. 15 2003 1712 [30] L.J. Diguna Q. Shen J. Kobayashi T. Toyada Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 2007 023116 [31] W. Tu H. Liu Chem. Mater. 12 2000 564 [32] S.M. Mirabedini H. Rahimi S. Hamedifar S.M. Mohseni Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 24 2004 163 [33] I. Gonzalez-Valls M. Lira-Cantu Energy Environ. Sci. 3 2010 789