Successful Adult-To-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Combined with A Cadaveric Split Left Lateral Segment
Zheyu Chen,Lunan Yan,Bo Li,Yong Zeng,Tionfu Wen,Jichun Zhao,Wentao Wang,Jiayin Yang,Yukui Ma,Jianwen Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20879
2006-01-01
Liver Transplantation
Abstract:The shortage of cadaveric livers has sparked an interest in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). LDLT may increase the liver graft pool and reduce waiting list mortality. Right-lobe donor hepatectomy is frequently required to obtain a graft of adequate size for adult recipients. Nevertheless, small-for-size syndrome is still a clinical syndrome described following liver transplantation and extended hepatectomy. Now, to expand the donor pool to relieve the pressure of the increasing number of liver transplantation candidates, clinicians are continually modifying criteria to accept organs, particularly those in the so-called expanded or marginal donor pool. Thus, the extension of LDLT to the adult recipient is obviously limited by SFSS and the safety of the donor. How can the contradiction of the donor and the recipient be solved, how can SFSS be prevented, and how can the safety of living donor be ensured? Here, we report our experience with adult-to-adult LDLT combined split liver from a cadaveric donor. LDLT, living donor liver transplantation. Lee et al. first reported LDLT using cadaveric split liver in 2001.1 In their report, 1 recipient received 1 left lobe from a living donor and 1 split left lateral segment from a cadaveric donor. However, our procedure isn't identical to Lee's, and our patient received 1 right lobe without a middle hepatic vein from a living donor and 1 split left lateral segment from a cadaveric donor. Theoretically, our method will show less postoperative complications than Lee's method, because a living right lobe and a split lateral segment could be implanted orthotopically in their original position in our case, and rotation of the donor isn't needed. Remarkably, we have followed up on the recipient for over 9 months after the operation, and we stress the information of computed tomography after the operation in the article. This article may be the first to report on the use of computed tomography for LDLT using cadaveric split liver. We provide more direct evidence for the procedure to be applied in clinical practice. In our case, the recipient was 35-year-old male (height,160 cm; weight, 70 kg; blood type B), and he was diagnosed as hepatitis B–related cirrhosis, and splenic hyperfunction. He experienced abdominal fullness for 1 year and had swelling of the 2 lower limbs. The living donor was the recipient's mother, a 56-year-old woman (height, 147 cm; weight, 52 kg; blood type O) who was generally healthy. The preoperative computed tomography scan calculated the total volume of the donor's liver to be 1,333.83 cm3. The volume of the right lobe of the liver, excluding the middle hepatic vein, was estimated to be 756.96 cm3. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed to identify the precise anatomy of the bile duct. The right lobe of the liver, not including the middle hepatic vein, was harvested. The resected right graft weighed 630 g with an estimated volume of 560 mL. The diameter of the right hepatic vein was 2.5 cm, the right portal vein 1.6 cm, and the right inferior hepatic vein 1.4 cm in right donor liver. The remnant liver was the left lobe with the middle hepatic vein, and the left total volume ratio was estimated to be 43%. Not only was the living donor smaller than the recipient in terms of both height and weight, but also her age was relatively old. The graft-to-recipient body weight ratio was only 0.9%. Furthermore, intraoperative fast-freezing liver biopsy technique revealed highly vacuolated degeneration of 10-20% of the hepatocytes. These data suggested that small-for-size syndrome could occur in the recipient after liver transplantation. Fortunately, a cadaveric donor prepared for another adult liver transplantation with blood type O was found. To ensure the success of the LDLT and cadaveric donor liver transplantation, respectively, we decided to perform a split-liver procedure. The cadaveric left lateral segment weighed 230 g and was used in LDLT, and the right-lobe graft including the middle hepatic vein was used for another adult liver transplantation. Thus, in LDLT combined cadaveric donor liver, the graft-to-recipient body weight ratio could reach 1.2%. The recipient's enlarged spleen was resected. Then the piggyback procedure was used to perform hepatectomy. Next, the living donor's right-lobe graft was orthotopically implanted to the recipient's right-lobe position, followed sequentially by anastomosis. The donor graft's right hepatic vein was anastomosed to the recipient's right hepatic vein to reconstruct right hepatic vein. The outside right hepatic vein of the living graft was incised and enlarged, and the stump of right hepatic vein in recipient was also incised and remained the only orifice in the inferior vena cava. The orifice was cut longitudinally, and the right hepatic vein of donor was anastomosed end-to-side to the vena cava longitudinally. Moreover, the right inferior hepatic vein in the living donor liver was 1.4 cm in diameter, and it was anastomosed with the inferior vena cava. Thus, sufficient venous outflow drainage could be ensured. The graft's portal vein was anastomosed to the recipient's right portal vein to reconstruct the right portal vein. And the graft's right hepatic artery was anastomosed to the recipient's right hepatic artery to reconstruct the right hepatic artery. Finally, the cadaveric left lateral segment was orthotopically implanted to the recipient's left-lobe position, followed sequentially by end-to-end anastomosis: the graft's left hepatic vein to the recipient left hepatic vein; the graft's left portal vein to the recipient's left portal vein; and the graft's left hepatic artery to the recipient's splenic artery. The bile duct reconstruction was started from the right-lobe graft; and the graft's right hepatic duct was anastomosed to the recipient's right common hepatic duct. The left lateral segment had 2 small bile ducts with respective diameters of 0.15 cm and 0.30 cm, and they were reconstructed through a Roux-en-Y cholangiojejunostomy. The total volume of blood transfusion was 1,200 mL, and the whole procedure took 23.3 hours. The illustration of the implanted 2 grafts after surgery is shown in Figure 1. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation combined with a cadaveric left lateral segment at the end of the operation. Postoperative transient bile leakage occurred in the donor on the third day after the operation, and the donor recovered completely after appropriate treatment. The recipient woke up 12 hours after surgery. He resumed food intake 3 days after the operation. Postoperative immunosuppressive therapy is routine. The recipient appeared in good health and no signs of acute graft rejection or infection were observed. The recipient has been followed up for more than 9 months after the operation (Fig. 2 and 3). Computed tomography scan of recipient's adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation combined a cadaveric left lateral segment at the 14th day after operation. There wasn't a congested area, because the right inferior hepatic vein of the living donor was anastomosed to the inferior vena cava of the recipient to ensure sufficient venous outflow drainage. Computed tomography scan of recipient's adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation combined a cadaveric left lateral segment more than 9 months after operation. Two grafts show normal triangle-shaped regeneration. The growing gap between the number of patients waiting for transplantation and available organs is still the main issue facing the transplant community. The major limitation of adult-to-adult LDLT is the small-for-size problem because of the concern for donor safety. To meet the metabolic needs of a large-sized recipient, the right lobe of a donor could be used, but the safety of the donor is a major issue.2-4 The introduction of a cadaveric left lateral segment in LDLT can apparently reduce the requirement of the harvested donor graft size, therefore securing the safety of the donor, and also minimize the occurrence of the small-for-size syndrome in the recipient. Even with the success of this reported case, we do not think that this technique could be considered as a standard therapy, and it should be applied only in rare and unusual situations.