Reduction of Influenza Disease Cost with Suboptimal Vaccination

Nicole M. Bailey,Andrew Wilson,Yongmei Li,Aaron Kamauu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.128

IF: 5.156

2015-01-01

Value in Health

Abstract:The burden of disease due to seasonal influenza in the United States (US) remains high, despite vaccination efforts. In 2003 it was estimated that the direct medical costs averaged $10.4 billion, with a total economic burden estimated at $87.1 billion. Although the seasonal influenza vaccination is not always a consummate match, we suggest that the burden of disease is still greatly reduced even when vaccine match to circulating strain is suboptimal. This study aims to examine the decreased cost burden associated with the seasonal influenza vaccine, even in seasons of suboptimal match, by comparing historic published trends to large claims data. Previously published data were compared to seasonal influenza records, queried from a claims database containing over 55 million unique patients. Regression modeling was used to compare cost burden of persons unvaccinated with the seasonal influenza vaccine and persons vaccinated during seasons where vaccine was considered (by the CDC-reported vaccine effectiveness percentage (VE%=(1-relative risk)*100%)) a suboptimal match for seasonal flu strain. Published vaccine effectiveness for a suboptimal seasonal influenza vaccination ranged from 39%-63% from flu seasons 2006-2007 through 2013-2014. This was approximately the same protection observed in the large claims database for the same year ranges. When modeled together with cost it was shown that this mismatch of vaccination to circulating virus still equated to a substantial reduction in burden of disease when vaccinated. Validation of results still ongoing. The burden of disease of influenza significantly decreases even when the seasonal influenza vaccine is a suboptimal match to the prevalent circulating strain. It is recommended that all persons able to receive the influenza vaccination do so, whether or not the match is optimal. It has been demonstrated that a suboptimal match effectively decreases the burden of the disease.