Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mcrc): Pooled Analysis from Randomized Controlled Trials (Rcts)

Niall Christopher Tebbutt,Herbert Hurwitz,Fairooz Kabbinavar,Bruce J. Giantonio,Zhongzhen Guan,Lada Mitchell,Daniel Waterkamp,Josep Tabernero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.3614
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:3614 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) with chemotherapy (CT) is a standard treatment for mCRC. This analysis pooled individual patient data from the clinical databases of seven RCTs (phase II or III) of BV in 1st- or 2nd-line treatment to further define clinical outcomes, including within subgroups. Methods: Patient data were pooled from 1st-line (AVF2107, NO16966, ARTIST, AVF2192, AVF0780, AGITG MAX) and 2nd-line (ECOG E3200) trials. All analyses were based on the intent-to-treat population. Overall and progression-free survival estimates (OS, PFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods. To assess differences in time to response variables by treatment arm (CT vs BV + CT), stratified random (overall) and fixed (subgroup comparisons) models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with each study included as a stratum. Results: Of the 3,763 pooled patients (CT [n=1773]; BV + CT [n=1990]), 58.8% were male, 39.6% were ≥65 years, and 45.7% had an ECOG performance status ≥1. OS and PFS were statistically significantly increased in BV-treated patients vs control patients. Safety data in this pooled analysis were consistent with the profile of BV from the individual studies. Conclusions: The addition of bevacizumab to CT resulted in statistically significant improvements in survival outcomes for mCRC patients in the overall analysis, with PFS benefit extending across subgroups defined by CT intensity, CT regimen, and KRAS status. [Table: see text]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?