210 UV Exposure and Risk of Lentigo Maligna in the United States

H. Higgins,W. Li,M. A. Weinstock,E. Cho,A. A. Qureshi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.02.238
IF: 7.59
2016-01-01
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Abstract:Lentigo maligna (LM) and melanoma in-situ (MIS), non-LM type may represent different entities. Risk factors for development of LM vs. MIS, non-LM types are unclear. We examined the associations between measures of UV radiation, including UV flux and UV index at birth, age 15, and age 30 years, and risk of LM compared with MIS, non-LM types based on two large US-based cohorts. Data from 1986-2010 were examined from both cohorts (Nurses' Health Study [NHS] and Health-Professionals Follow-up Study [HPFS]). The diagnosis of MIS was obtained by self-reported questionnaires biennially and all diagnoses were confirmed by histopathological review. We calculated the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between UV radiation and risk of LM. NHS and HPFS data were combined for analysis. 271 LM and 781 MIS, non-LM cases were reported. LM was more likely to occur on the head/neck compared to MIS, non-LM (p<0.0001). Compared with cases of MIS, non-LM type, the risk of LM increased with the increasing UV flux exposure in men (p for trend=.01), but not in women (p for trend=0.53). For UV index, women showed an increased risk of developing LM compared to MIS, non-LM type in those who lived in states with UV index of 6 (medium) at age 30 (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.08-4.21). Men showed an increased risk of developing LM compared to MIS, non-LM if they were born in states with UV index 6 (HR 3.66, 95% CI 1.06-12.70). No association was found in high UV index states for either gender. In this study, LM more commonly appeared on the head/neck compared to MIS, non-LM tumors and UV flux played a role in development of LM in men but not in women.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?