Tumor Necrosis Predicts Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Node-Negative Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Xin-Ke Zhang,Zhi-Ling Zhang,Ping Yang,Mu-Yan Cai,Wan-Ming Hu,Jing-Ping Yun,Fang-Jian Zhou,Chao-Nan Qian,Yun Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyv127
IF: 2.925
2015-01-01
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:Tumor necrosis has been indicated as a factor for the poor clinical outcome in human cancers. We aim to disclose the association between tumor necrosis and overall survival and recurrence-free survival in node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy.METHODS:A retrospective cohort of 100 patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma from January 1990 to June 2011 was enrolled in this study. Univariate analysis with Log-rank test and multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards regression models were conducted to determine the correlations of tumor necrosis with overall survival and recurrence-free survival.RESULTS:Tumor necrosis was presented in 48 patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and was significantly associated with the advanced pathological stage (P < 0.001), high tumor grade (P < 0.001), subsequent bladder tumor (P = 0.018), vascular invasion (P < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor necrosis as an independent unfavorable predictor of overall survival in node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 9.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-80.89, P = 0.045).CONCLUSIONS:Tumor necrosis was an independent factor of adverse clinical outcomes in node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who received radical nephroureterectomy. Evaluation of tumor necrosis might be of clinical significance to determine whether patients with node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma should be given further therapy after radical nephroureterectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?