The Acceptability and Feasibility of Chemical Prophylaxis for Schoolchildren and Adolescents with Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Shanghai, China: A Qualitative Study

Y. Li,C. Zhou,Y. Zheng,J. Hong,M. Yang,Z. Yuan,Y. Hu,B. Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.02.849
IF: 12.073
2016-01-01
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Background: China has the 2nd highest burden of tuberculosis (TB). More about 40-45% of population were infected with TB and most of them were latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). However, with better socioeconomic status, the prevalence of LTBI in Shanghai is relatively lower, especially among children. The contact history with TB patients would increase the risk of LTBI, and about 20% children contacts had a positive T-SPOT.TB result in shanghai. Children with LTBI could contribute to the pool of individuals with LTBI from which future active TB cases will arise. Chemical prophylaxis for people with LTBI is recommended by WHO to end TB occurrence. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of chemoprophylaxis for schoolchildren and adolescents with LTBI in Shanghai, China. Methods & Materials: Seven Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted in three districts in Shanghai among August and October, 2015. Forty-two participants including 15 TB contacts and 27 health care providers (either were TB program officials or general practitioners from CDCs and community health-centers) were invited. The Data about TB management, children TB-screening and acceptability of chemoprophylaxis for children with LTBI were collected by FGDs. Nvivo 10.0 was used to identify the key issues from these interviews through coding, categorization and grouping into emergent themes. Results: While many children used to reject TB-screening due to concerns of radiation and haemospasia, the screening among children TB contacts were more acceptable by parents. Poor knowledge about positive T-SPOT.TB results and chemoprophylaxis has made it difficult to get the permission on prophylaxis for schoolchildren and adolescents with LTBI. Health providers could understand the potential benefits about chemoprophylaxis but still thought it unfeasible by now considering the adverse drug reaction, high costs for medication, long duration and unclear effect indicators. In addition, heavy workloads and poor incentive mechanisms were not uncommon in the basic TB control management. Conclusion: The connection between households, schools, communities and hospitals should be established for further surveillance of adverse drug-reaction and health education on LTBI and chemoprophylaxis need to be strengthened. The current financing and incentive mechanisms of TB control need to be improved for better performance in TB control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?