Daclizumab Hyp Reduces Total Disability Burden of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Results from an Exploratory Area under the Curve Analysis

A. Boyko,L. Kappos,J. Rose,K. Selmaj,D. L. Arnold,E. Havrdova,M. Kaufman,H. Wiendl,S. Greenberg,S. Shang,P. Wang,L. Barbato
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.1059
IF: 4.4
2015-01-01
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Abstract:Background: Daclizumab high-yield process (DAC HYP) 150 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks significantly reduced 12-week confirmed disability progression by 57% (P = 0.0211) versus placebo over 52 weeks in SELECT. In DECIDE, 16% (P = 0.1575) and 27% (P = 0.0332) reductions in 12-week and 24-week confirmed disability progression, respectively, were observed for DAC HYP 150 mg versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a over 144 weeks. Objective: To determine the effect of DAC HYP on total longitudinal disability burden measured by area under the curve (AUC) integrating all measured Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening and improvement experienced by patients over 52 and 96 weeks in SELECT and DECIDE, respectively. Methods: AUC for EDSS change from baseline was calculated post hoc using the trapezoidal rule with missing data imputed using last observation carried forward method (units of EDSS years). Positive value in AUC denotes net worsening in EDSS from baseline and negative value net improvement. Least squares mean AUC was obtained using ANCOVA; between-treatment group comparison used ANCOVA on rank of AUC. Patient and/or IRB approval was obtained. Results: In SELECT, DAC HYP patients (n = 199) had net improvement in disability (−0.042 EDSS years) while placebo patients (n = 196) had net worsening (+0.074 EDSS years; between-treatment difference P = 0.0089). In DECIDE, DAC HYP patients (n = 912) had net improvement in disability (−0.062 EDSS years) while interferon beta-1a patients (n = 900) had net worsening (+0.027 EDSS years; between-treatment difference P = 0.0267). Conclusions: These findings from SELECT and DECIDE suggest positive effects of DAC HYP on total longitudinal disability burden.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?