Abstract:Minority shareholder protection is especially important in countries with weak institutions. Prior studies indicate that social media facilitates minority shareholder activism by connecting otherwise isolated individual shareholders and increasing their bargaining power against the controlling shareholders. Whereas prior studies focus on the ex-post monitoring role of social media in corporate governance, we investigate whether and how minority shareholder social media engagement could deter insiders' entrenchment incentives in an ex-ante fashion. Specifically, using high merger premiums and private placement financing as proxies for activities that reflect insider entrenchment incentives in M&As, we find that greater social media engagement lowers M&A premiums and the likelihood of using private placement to benefit the controlling shareholders. This result holds after we control for the governance role of conventional media or analyst coverage, and institutional investors. Our mechanism analysis reveals that the effectiveness of social media in curbing entrenchment incentives in M&A is conditional on the perceived capital market consequences and the perceived likelihood of proposal vetoes. Further analysis shows that minority shareholder activism plays a greater role in curbing entrenchment in M&As when the minority shareholder sentiment expressed on social media is more negative and is more M&A-specific, as well as when social media facilitates higher quality discussions following an exogenous regulatory shock. We also find that minority shareholder activism is associated with better M&A performance. Our study highlights the ex-ante governance role of minority shareholder activism in weak institutions and informs regulators on the critical need to provide a platform for minority shareholders to effectively voice their concerns.

An international study of shareholder protection in freeze-out M&A transactions

Law, Investor Protection and LBOs

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

Expropriation of Minority Shareholders in Politically Connected Firms

Disproportional Ownership Structure and Stock Market Liquidity in China

Minority shareholder activism and its ex-ante monitoring role in corporate M&A decisions: Evidence from China

Investor Protection and Cross-Border Acquisitions by Chinese Listed Firms: the Moderating Role of Institutional Shareholders

The Impact of Minority Shareholder Protection and Atomization of Shareholder Base on the Nonoperating Activities of Firms

Investor Protection and Ownership Decentralization

The Evolutionary Analysis on the Expropriation of Large Shareholders on Minority Shareholders

Value Creation and Value Capture in Governing Shareholder Relationships: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in an Emerging Market

Estimating the expropriation of minority shareholders: Results from a new empirical approach

Study on Expropriation Behavior and Negative Externality of Controlling Shareholders

A Review of Controlling Shareholder's Expropriation and Corporate Governance in Ownership Concentrated Market

Are Target Shareholders Systematically Exploited in Management Buyouts and Freezeouts?

Minority shareholders' activism and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

Institutional Investors and Earnings Management Associated with Controlling Shareholders' Promises: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

The governance effects of social media engagement on M&A outcomes: Evidence from China

Separation of control and cash flow rights, ultimate controlling shareholders’ equity pledge ratio and risk of control transfer--evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Can common institutional owners inhibit bad mergers and acquisitions? Evidence from China

Controlling Shareholders’ Tunneling and Executive Compensation: Evidence from China