Severe Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Depression: Should We Consider Stereotactic Neurosurgery?
Ludvic Zrinzo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s407210
IF: 2.989
2024-03-05
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Abstract:Ludvic Zrinzo Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK Correspondence: Ludvic Zrinzo, Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical & Motor Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Second Floor, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, U.K, Email Functional neurosurgery involves modulation of activity within neural circuits that drive pathological activity. Neurologists and neurosurgeons have worked closely together, advancing the field for over a century, such that neurosurgical procedures for movement disorders are now accepted as "standard of care", benefiting hundreds of thousands of patients. As with movement disorders, some neuropsychiatric illnesses, including obsessive compulsive disorder and depression, can be framed as disorders of neural networks. Over the past two decades, evidence has accumulated that stereotactic neurosurgery can help some patients with mental disorders. Nevertheless, despite the availability of class I evidence for some interventions, there is a huge mismatch between the prevalence of severe refractory mental disorders and the number of referrals made to specialised functional neurosurgery services. This paper examines the historical trajectory of neurosurgery for movement and mental disorders. A review of neurosurgical techniques, including stereotactic radiofrequency ablation, gamma knife, deep brain stimulation, and magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound, explains the high degree of safety afforded by technological advances in the field. Evidence from clinical trials supporting functional neurosurgery for mental disorders, including obsessive compulsive disorder and depression, is presented. An improved understanding of modern functional neurosurgery should foster collaboration between psychiatry and neurosurgery, providing hope to patients whose symptoms are refractory to all other treatments. Keywords: stereotactic neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depression, stereotactic ablation, focused ultrasound Much of neurosurgical practice involves treatment of patients with focal pathologies that distort the structure of the central nervous system. This includes removal of blood clots, tumors, and herniated intervertebral discs. Conversely, functional neurosurgery involves modulation of activity within neural circuits that drive pathological activity, usually in the context of a network brain disorder. The prime example is the neurosurgical treatment of tremor, where modulation of abnormal neural activity can provide significant relief (Figure 1). Numerous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of functional neurosurgical procedures in ameliorating the symptoms and quality of life of individuals living with tremor, Parkinson disease, and dystonia. 1–4 Neurologists and neurosurgeons have worked together, advancing the field for over a century, such that neurosurgical procedures for movement disorders are now accepted as "standard of care", benefiting hundreds of thousands of patients. Figure 1 Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation thalamotomy for tremor. Hand drawn spiral before (left) and after (right). The success of functional neurosurgery in movement disorders has led several multidisciplinary groups around the world to explore whether a similar collaboration can advance the field of neuropsychiatry. As with movement disorders, some neuropsychiatric illnesses can be framed as disorders of neural networks. Over the past two decades, evidence has accumulated that stereotactic neurosurgery can help selected patients with mental disorders. 5 Nevertheless, despite the availability of class I evidence for some interventions, there is a huge mismatch between the prevalence of severe refractory mental disorders and the number of referrals made to specialised functional neurosurgery services. 6 There are varied reasons leading to this reality. Reviewing the historical trajectory of neurosurgery for movement and mental disorders provides some understanding of the current situation. Functional neurosurgery has its roots in the late nineteenth century and was born of collaboration between neurologists and neurosurgeons. John Hughlings Jackson, a neurologist, and Victor Horsley, the father of neurosurgery, promoted the theory of cortical localization of cerebral function. This led Horsley to perform resections of the motor cortex for the arrest of severe athetosis in the 1890s. 7 That paresis or paralysis of a limb was preferable to the movement disorder is testament to these desperate times. By the middle of the 20th century, by combining serendipity and scientific exploration, it became clear that smaller, minimally invasive neurosurgical procedures were superior to large, open, and wid -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,clinical neurology