Abstract:Background Computed tomography (CT) scan is a common imaging technique used to evaluate the severity of a head injury. The overuse of diagnostic interventions in the health system is a growing concern worldwide. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the rate of CT scan overuse in cases of mild head injury. Methods Eligibility criteria: We encompassed observational studies—either designed as cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional investigations—that reported on CT scan overuse rates for mild head injuries. Studies had to be published in peer-reviewed, English-language sources and provide full content access Information sources: Web of Sciences, Scopus, Medline via PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception until April 1, 2023. Studies were included if reporting the overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries using validated criteria. Risk of bias: We used the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies ‐ of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to evaluate the risk bias assessment of included studies. Two independent reviewers evaluated the eligibility of studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Synthesis of results: Overuse estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate any sources of heterogeneity. Point rate of overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries was the main outcome measured as percentage point estimates with corresponding 95% CIs. Results Included studies: Of the 913 potentially relevant studies identified, eight studies were selected for the final analysis. Synthesis of results: The pooled rate of CT scan overuse in patients with mild head injury was found to be 27% [95% CI: 16–43; I 2 = 99%]. The rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases varied depending on the criteria used. The rate of CT scan overuse was 37% [95% CI: 32–42; I 2 = 0%] with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 30% [95% CI: 16–49; I 2 = 99%] with the Canadian computed tomography head rule, and 10% [95% CI: 8–14; I 2 = 0%] with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network criterion (PERCAN). Based on subgroup analyses, the rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases was observed to be 30% with the Canadian computed tomography head rule criterion, 43% with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criterion, and 18% with the New Orleans criterion. Conclusion Limitations of evidence: The restricted number of included studies may impact generalizability. High heterogeneity was observed, leading to subgroup analyses based on age, assessment criteria, and study region. Absent data on overuse causes hinders drawing conclusions on contributing factors. Furthermore, this study solely addressed overuse rates, not associated harm or benefits. Interpretation: The overuse of CT scans in mild head injury patients is concerning, as it can result in unnecessary radiation exposure and higher healthcare costs. Clinicians and policymakers should prioritize the implementation of guidelines to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, healthcare costs, and potential harm to patients. Trial registration The study protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO under the identification code CRD42023416080 . https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023416080 .

Checklist Can Help Avoid CT Chest Scans in a Third of Blunt Trauma Cases

Utilizing Un-enhanced Chest Computed Tomography Screening for Blunt Trauma Surgery Decisions

Scanning the aged to minimize missed injury: An EAST multicenter study

Minor head injury and blunt abdominal trauma: when should you use CT imaging?

CT imaging of blunt chest trauma

Computed tomography benefits and cost in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma at an Egyptian University Hospital

Utilization of a clinical prediction rule for abdominal–pelvic CT scans in patients with blunt abdominal trauma

Overuse of computed tomography for mild head injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

No trauma-related diagnosis in emergency trauma room whole-body computer tomography of patients with inconspicuous primary survey

An analysis of missed injuries in patients with severe trauma

Chest x-ray vs. computed tomography of the chest in pediatric blunt trauma

Watch Out for the Early Killers: Imaging Diagnosis of Thoracic Trauma

Reduction of paediatric head CT utilisation at a rural general hospital emergency department

[Benefits and drawbacks of CT scan as a triple rule-out exam in acute chest pain to exclude acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection]

Effectiveness of the head CT choice decision aid in parents of children with minor head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

The clinical implications of using a low threshold for computed tomography scans in older patients presenting with a proximal femur fracture

Are We Imaging Gently in Indiana? A System-Wide Population-Based Study of Chest CT Use in the Pediatric Trauma Population

Thoracolumbar Evaluation in the Low-Risk Trauma Patient: A Pilot Study Towards Development of a Clinical Decision Rule to Avoid Unnecessary Imaging in the Emergency Department

Optimizing the Strategy of Radiological Examination Reduces Iatrogenic Radiation Exposure in Major Trauma Patients

Accuracy of Clinician Practice Compared With Three Head Injury Decision Rules in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study

The Risk of Deterioration in GCS13–15 Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis