Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of Orally Inhaled Salbutamol in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Bo Jiang,Zourong Ruan,Jinliang Chen,Honggang Lou,Rong Shao,Fang Jin,Huahao Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2016.1151027
IF: 3.727
2016-01-01
Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
Abstract:Context: Salbutamol is a short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist that has been used for many years for relief of bronchospasm. However, studies on the pharmacokinetic profile of orally inhaled salbutamol doses used in clinical practice have not yet been reported in Chinese subjects.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and evaluate the bioequivalence of two orally inhaled salbutamol formulations.Materials and methods: A single-dose randomized fasting two-period, two-treatment and two-sequence crossover open-label bioequivalence study was conducted in 24 healthy Chinese adult male volunteers, with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Plasma concentrations of salbutamol were determined using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including AUC(0-0.33 h), AUC(0-24 h) and C-max were calculated and the 90% confidence intervals of the ratio (test/reference) pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by analysis of variance on logarithmically transformed data.Results: The mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of the reference drug were AUC(0-0.33h), 227.2 (89.9) pg.h/ml; AUC(0-24 h), 2551.9 (1008.0) pg.h/ml; C-max, 801.3 (307.3) pg/ml and t(1/2), 5.14(1.36) h. Those of the test drug were AUC(0-0.33 h), 244.0 (104.4) pg.h/ml; AUC(0-24 h), 2664.4 (1081.8) pg.h/ml; C-max, 873.7 (374.4) pg/ml, t(1/2), 5.29 (1.23) h. The median value for T-max was 0.25 h for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the AUC(0-0.33h), AUC(0-24h) and C-max were in the range of 0.892-1.208, 0.876-1.195 and 0.911-1.203, respectively.Conclusion: This single-dose study found that the test and reference products met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence of China in healthy Chinese volunteers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?