Capacitance Determination for the Evaluation of Electrochemically Active Surface Area in a Catalyst Layer of NiFe-Layer Double Hydroxide for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyser

Zhong Xie,Wei Qu,Elizabeth A. Fisher,Jason Fahlman,Koichiro Asazawa,Takao Hayashi,Hiroshi Shirataki,Hideaki Murase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17030556
IF: 3.4
2024-01-24
Materials
Abstract:The determination of the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of a catalyst layer (CL) of a non-precious metal catalyst is of fundamental importance in optimizing the design of a durable CL for anion exchange membrane (AEM) water electrolysis, but has yet to be developed. Traditional double layer capacitance (Cdl), measured by cyclic voltammetry (CV), is not suitable for the estimation of the ECSA due to the nonconductive nature of Ni-based oxides and hydroxides in the non-Faradaic region. This paper analyses the applicability of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) compared to CV in determining capacitances for the estimation of the ECSA of AEM-based CLs in an aqueous KOH electrolyte solution. A porous electrode transmission line (TML) model was employed to obtain the capacitance–voltage dependence from 1.0 V to 1.5 V at 20 mV intervals, covering both non-Faradic and Faradic regions. This allows for the identification of the contribution of a NiFe-layered double hydroxide (LDH) catalyst and supports in a CL, to capacitances in both non-Faradic and Faradic regions. A nearly constant double layer capacitance (Qdl) observed in the non-Faradic region represents the interfaces between catalyst supports and electrolytes. The capacitance determined in the Faradic region by EIS experiences a peak capacitance (QF), which represents the maximum achievable ECSA in an AEMCL during reactions. The EIS method was additionally validated in durability testing. An approximate 30% loss of QF was noted while Qdl remained unchanged following an eight-week test at 1 A/cm2 constant current density, implying that QF, determined by EIS, is sensitive to and therefore suitable for assessing the loss of ECSA. This universal method can provide a reasonable estimate of catalyst utilization and enable the monitoring of catalyst degradation in CLs, in particular in liquid alkaline electrolyte water electrolysis systems.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to accurately evaluate the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of non - noble metal catalyst layers (CLs) in anion - exchange membrane (AEM) water electrolyzers. Specifically, traditional double - layer capacitance (Cdl) measurement methods, such as cyclic voltammetry (CV), are not suitable for ECSA estimation due to the non - conductive nature of Ni - based oxides and hydroxides in the non - Faradaic region. Therefore, this paper explores the effectiveness of using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) compared to CV in determining capacitance to evaluate the ECSA of AEM - based CLs in KOH electrolyte solutions. ### Main research contents: 1. **Comparison between EIS and CV**: - Evaluate ECSA by measuring capacitance through EIS, especially in the non - Faradaic and Faradaic regions. - Use the porous electrode transmission line (TML) model to obtain the capacitance - voltage dependence in the voltage range from 1.0 V to 1.5 V, covering the non - Faradaic and Faradaic regions. 2. **Experimental methods**: - **CV scan**: Conduct CV scans in 1 M KOH electrolyte with a voltage range from 0.9 V to 1.1 V and scan rates of 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mV/s respectively. - **EIS measurement**: Conduct EIS measurements in the range from 1.0 V to 1.5 V at 20 - mV intervals, with a frequency range from 100 kHz to 1 Hz. 3. **Theoretical basis**: - Relationship between capacitance (C) and ECSA: \[ \text{ECSA}=\frac{C}{C_s} \] where \( C_s \) is the specific capacitance per unit area. - For systems with non - pure capacitive behavior, use the constant - phase element (CPE) to represent capacitance, and its expression is: \[ Z_{\text{CPE}}=\frac{1}{(j\omega)^\alpha Q} \] where \( \alpha \) is the phase angle, \( j \) is the imaginary unit, and \( \omega \) is the angular frequency. 4. **Result analysis**: - **CV results**: An approximately flat charge/discharge region was observed below 1.30 V, while an irreversible metal cation redox peak was observed near 1.39 V. - **EIS results**: The EIS responses from 1.0 V to 1.5 V indicate that the total capacitance (Q_t) value remains relatively constant between 1.0 V and 1.26 V, approximately 2 F/s^(1 - \alpha). As the voltage exceeds 1.26 V, the Q value begins to increase and reaches a peak at around 1.4 V. ### Conclusions: - The EIS method shows high sensitivity and reliability in evaluating the ECSA of non - noble metal catalyst layers in AEM water electrolyzers. - The capacitance values obtained by EIS measurement can effectively reflect the changes in ECSA of the catalyst layer at different voltages. Especially in long - term stability tests, the EIS method can detect the loss of ECSA. In summary, by comparing the EIS and CV methods, this paper proposes a new method suitable for evaluating the ECSA of non - noble metal catalyst layers in AEM water electrolyzers, providing an important tool for optimizing the design of catalyst layers and improving their performance.