Abstract:The clustering problem is a difficult problem for the data stream domain. This is because the large volumes of data arriving in a stream renders most traditional algorithms too inefficient. In recent years, a few one-pass clustering algorithms have been developed for the data stream problem. Although such methods address the scalability issues of the clustering problem, they are generally blind to the evolution of the data and do not address the following issues: (1) The quality of the clusters is poor when the data evolves considerably over time. (2) A data stream clustering algorithm requires much greater functionality in discovering and exploring clusters over different portions of the stream. The widely used practice of viewing data stream clustering algorithms as a class of one-pass clustering algorithms is not very useful from an application point of view. For example, a simple one-pass clustering algorithm over an entire data stream of a few years is dominated by the outdated history of the stream. The exploration of the stream over different time windows can provide the users with a much deeper understanding of the evolving behavior of the clusters. At the same time, it is not possible to simultaneously perform dynamic clustering over all possible time horizons for a data stream of even moderately large volume. This paper discusses a fundamentally different philosophy for data stream clustering which is guided by application-centered requirements. The idea is divide the clustering process into an online component which periodically stores detailed summary statistics and an offine component which uses only this summary statistics. The offine component is utilized by the analyst who can use a wide variety of inputs (such as time horizon or number of clusters) in order to provide a quick understanding of the broad clusters in the data stream. The problems of efficient choice, storage, and use of this statistical data for a fast data stream turns out to be quite tricky. For this purpose, we use the concepts of a pyramidal time frame in conjunction with a microclustering approach. Our performance experiments over a number of real and synthetic data sets illustrate the effectiveness, efficiency, and insights provided by our approach.

Cluster-preserving sampling from fully-dynamic streaming graphs.

Clustering-Structure Representative Sampling from Graph Streams.

Cluster-preserving Sampling Algorithm for Large-Scale Graphs.

A Bounded-Size Clustering Algorithm on Fully-Dynamic Streaming Graphs

Evolutionary Clustering of Streaming Trajectories

Streaming Graph Embeddings via Incremental Neighborhood Sketching

Optimizing Streaming Graph Partitioning Via a Heuristic Greedy Method and Caching Strategy.

Network Sampling: From Static to Streaming Graphs

Feature-Selected and -Preserved Sampling for High-Dimensional Stream Data Summary

Clustering Stream Data by Exploring the Evolution of Density Mountain

Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Weighted Sampling for Accurate Subgraph Counting on Fully Dynamic Graph Streams

Effective indexing for dynamic structural graph clustering

Incremental Algorithms for Sampling Dynamic Graphs.

Summarization and Matching of Density-Based Clusters in Streaming Environments

Streaming Graph Partitioning For Large Graphs With Limited Memory

Density-Based Clustering over an Evolving Data Stream with Noise

A streaming edge sampling method for network visualization

Clustering Affiliation Inference from Graph Samples

Adaptive Shrinkage Estimation for Streaming Graphs

Sketch-Based Anomaly Detection in Streaming Graphs

A framework for clustering evolving data streams