A General Formulation of Linear Power Flow Models: Basic Theory and Error Analysis

Zhifang Yang,Kaigui Xie,Juan Yu,Haiwang Zhong,Ning Zhang,Qing Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2871182
IF: 7.326
2019-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Abstract:Linear power flow models are widely used in power systems to simplify the nonlinear power flow equations. The DC power flow model is one of the representatives. There are many other linear power flow models that improve the DC power flow model with the inclusion of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{Q}$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{v}$</tex-math></inline-formula> . However, existing linear models are derived based on empirical mathematical approximation without a general methodology guidance. In this paper, we found that the fundamental difference among different linear power flow models lies in the formulation of “independent variables.” Based on this finding, a general formulation of linear power flow models is proposed. The linearization error is theoretically analyzed. In particular, the case when <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{ \theta }$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{v^{\scriptscriptstyle k}}$</tex-math></inline-formula> are regarded as independent variables is thoroughly investigated. Method for finding the linear power flow with the minimum error is presented. The formulation of the independent variables associated with the minimum linearization error is determined by the distribution of state variables <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{v}$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{\theta }$</tex-math></inline-formula> . It is shown that the linearization error when <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{v^{\scriptscriptstyle 2}}$</tex-math></inline-formula> is regarded as an independent variable is normally smaller than that for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{v}$</tex-math></inline-formula> because of the special properties of the distribution of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\boldsymbol{v}$</tex-math></inline-formula> in power grids.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?