Abstract:Aims: Patients with homonymous hemianopia may present a subtle ipsilesional deficit, recently referred to as 'sightblindness' in addition to the contralesional visual field defect. We recently demonstrated that this deficit could be worse in right brain-damaged patients with left hemianopia than in left brain-damaged patients with right hemianopia, confirming right hemisphere dominance for visuo-spatial and attentional capacities. In the present study we investigate whether this ipsilesional deficit could be attentional in nature and to what extent it is comparable in right brain-damaged (RBD) patients with left hemianopia and in RBD patients with left neglect. The study was also conducted in RBD patients with neither left hemianopia nor left neglect signs in order to test if a right hemisphere lesion per se could be responsible for subtle ipsilesional attentional deficit. To reach this aim, we tested selective attentional capacities in both visual fields of 10 right brain-damaged patients with left neglect (LN), 8 right brain-damaged patients with left homonymous hemianopia (LHH), 8 right brain-damaged patients with no signs of left neglect or left hemianopia (RBD controls), and 17 healthy age-matched participants (Normal controls). Method: A lateralized letter-detection task was used to test if right-brain damaged patients with LN or LH may present a deficit of selective attention in their right, ipsilesional visual field, in comparison to Normal and RBD controls. Participants were asked to detect a target letter in either a single large stimulus (low attentional load) or a small stimulus surrounded by flankers (high attentional load). Stimuli were displayed either in the left or in the right visual field. Accuracy and reaction times were recorded. Results: Results on accuracy showed that both LN and LH patients exhibited lower correct responses than Normal controls in their ipsilesional right visual field, suggesting an attentional deficit in their ipsilesional, supposed healthy visual field. More specifically, LH patients exhibited a specific deficit for processing single large stimuli, but not for processing flanked stimuli, relative to normal controls. LN patients exhibited lower correct responses for processing all types of stimulus than normal controls, but also than right brain damaged controls, in both visual fields suggesting a non-lateralized deficit not only due to the right hemisphere lesion. Furthermore, this deficit is more pronounced for flanked small stimuli, requiring higher attentional load. Conclusions: The present results bring further evidence that patients with left homonymous hemianopia or left unilateral neglect both present a weaker but significant ipsilesional deficit in addition to their well-known massive contralesional deficit. The presence of a specific attentional deficit in the right ipsilesional visual field of left hemianopic and left neglect patients is discussed regarding the hypothesis of hemispheric specialization for selective spatial attention and may have clinical implications for both conditions.

Exploring the Neural Correlates of the Reversed Letter Effect: Evidence from Left and Right Parietal Patients.

The neural mechanism of left hemiparalexia and left hemialexia in reading Chinese characters

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Left Parietal Cortex Facilitates Visual Search for a Letter among Its Mirror Images

Visual Word Form Processing in the Right Hemisphere: Evidence from Neuropsychological Investigations in Two Chinese Patients with a Splenium Lesion

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with visual scanning treatment on cognitive and behavioral symptoms of left hemispatial neglect in right hemispheric stroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

A Clash of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processes in Visual Search: the Reversed Letter Effect Revisited.

Impairments in Top Down Attentional Processes in Right Parietal Patients: Paradoxical Functional Facilitation in Visual Search.

Weaker Interference from Non-Targets, Rather Than Novelty, Makes a Reversed Letter Easier to Find in Visual Search

Differential contribution of right and left parietal cortex to the control of spatial attention: a simultaneous EEG-rTMS study

Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect

Lateralized reading in the healthy brain: A behavioral and computational study on the nature of the visual field effect

Hemispheric differences in altered reactivity of brain oscillations at rest after posterior lesions

The disengagement deficit after right-hemisphere damage: Distinct roles of lateral frontal and parietal damage

Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention

Space- and object-based attention in patients with a single hemisphere following childhood resection

Visual-Spatial Search in Neglect Syndrome as a Function of the Number of Stimuli in the Hemifields

The effects of bilateral posterior parietal cortex tRNS on reading performance

The parietal cortex and attentional modulations of activities of the visual cortex.

Investigating the effect of rTMS over the temporoparietal cortex on the Right Ear Advantage for perceived and imagined voices

Electrophysiological Correlates of Character Transposition in the Left and Right Visual Fields

Influence of different spatial representations on the SNARC effect for letters: Electrophysiological evidence