Female wet workers and contact dermatitis: patch test results and sensitization in North-East Italy.
V. D. De Giusti,A. Prodi,F. L. Filon,F. Rui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0b013e31825228ed
2012-05-01
Dermatitis
Abstract:To the Editor: Occupational skin diseases belong to the most frequently occurring occupational diseases. Clinical manifestations and consequences vary from mild to serious with temporary or permanent work disability. Occupational skin diseases are typically from 20% to 50% of all occupational diseases and 90% of them are allergic or irritant contact dermatitis. ‘‘Wet work’’ is one of the most important causes of occupational skin disease, and hand dermatitis has a high prevalence among this group of workers who have their hands exposed to water and other skin irritants for a large part of the day. One of the most representative groups of ‘‘wet workers’’ are cleaners. Other professional groups are bartenders, hairdressers, and beauticians. Cleaning products have become an indispensable part of our modern lives. They are used on a daily basis in nearly all workplaces and homes. In recent years, cleaning has been identified as an occupational risk because of an increased incidence of asthma and asthmalike symptoms among cleaning workers. For those who experience nickel allergy, ‘‘wet work’’ involves an increased risk of developing hand eczema, because water and detergents harm the skin barrier, so that much less nickel is required to cause or worsen hand eczema. The purpose of this study was to investigate the associations between ‘‘wet work’’ and patch test sensitization in a population of patients experiencing contact dermatitis in various units of Dermatology or Occupational Medicine in Northeastern Italy. From 1997 to 2004, 9771 women with symptoms and/ or signs of suspected allergic dermatitis underwent clinical examination and patch tests. They were categorized on the basis of their profession: ‘‘wet workers’’ (cleaners, bartenders, beauticians, hairdressers), white-collar workers, other workers, and nonworkers (pensioners, unemployed, etc). We excluded from ‘‘wet workers’’ health care workers because they have other interfering exposure (disinfectants). The patients were patch tested with the European baseline series using Finn chambers on Scanpor tape. All haptens were applied on the upper back and removed after 48 hours. The sites were examined by a dermatologist on removal and 72 or 96 hours after application, according to the guidelines of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Positive reactions of +, ++ and +++ grades were considered positive. Data analysis was performed using the software SPSS (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Ill) and Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash). The difference between groups was tested with the Mann-Whitney test. The difference between categorical data cross tabulated into contingency table was tested with the W statistics. Associations between patch test results and occupation were investigated by means of multivariate logistic regression analysis, in the 4 age categories: 22 years and younger, 23 to 30 years, 31 to 40 years, and 41 years and older. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated assuming ‘‘white-collar workers’’ as the reference category. P G 0.05 was considered significant. In our population (9771 women), 1320 (13.5%) are wet workers, 2725 (27.9%) are nonworkers, 2206 (22.6%) are white-collar workers, and 3520 (36%) are other workers. Wet workers were younger (median age, 32.5 years; range, 15Y77 years; P G 0.001) with respect to nonworkers (median age, 61 years; range, 18Y94 years) and other workers (median age, 35.0 years; range, 15Y75 years) but were older than white-collar workers (median age, 29 years; range, 16Y77 years). Dermatitis was localized to the hands and forearms in 45.9% of wet workers, and it has the highest prevalence among considered groups. The difference was statistically significant versus nonworkers (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.8Y2.6) and versus white-collar workers (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.61Y2.32). Localization to the hands and forearms was similar with other workers (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.9Y1.28). Association between sensitization to haptens and female wet workers is reported in Table 1 assuming white-collar From the Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Science Department of Public Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.