Abstract:Background: The technical evolution of hernia repair has brought to the introduction of laparoscopy in this field. The most common laparoscopic techniques are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. Indirect comparisons between TAPP and TEP have raised questions as to which is the superior approach in improving patient outcomes; however, there is still a scarcity of data directly comparing these laparoscopic approaches. The aim of this report is to offer a retrospective comparison between the two techniques with a long-term follow-up. Methods: This study is a retrospective comparative study, comparing TEP and TAPP in the treatment of groin hernias. All patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair from 2015 and 2020 at a large UK Hospital Trust with tertiary referral center, were considered as eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was rate of successful surgery defined as absence of recurrence and chronic pain at the end of the follow-up. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate (the switch from TEP to TAPP was considered as a conversion for the index procedure), need for admission, readmission rate, serious adverse events (including visceral injuries and vascular injuries), rate of persisting pain at the end of follow-up, operative time and overall complications rate (hematoma, seroma, wound/superficial infection, mesh/deep infection, port site hernia). Results: Of the patients included in the study who underwent laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia between 2015 and 2020, 140 (55.1%) underwent TEP and 114 (44.9%) had TAPP repair. The mean operative time did not differ between the two groups (P=0.202). The conversion rate was nil. The two procedures did not differ for intraoperative and postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the TAPP group (P<0.0001). The overall recurrence rate was 2.4%. and did not differ between the two groups. Costs were acquired from the clinical coding department. Mean costs were measured in pounds sterling and a significant difference was noted between the two groups (P=0.083). In the short term, the most common complication was seroma formation and was significantly more frequent in the TAPP group (P<0.001). In the long term, chronic pain was the most frequent complication in both groups and significant correlated when the operation performed for recurrent hernia, whereas the hernia Type 3 was a factor that which influenced recurrence. Conclusions: In conclusion, TAPP and TEP have similar, overall complication risks, postoperative acute and chronic pain incidence and recurrence rates. Since TAPP and TEP have comparable outcomes it is recommended that the choice of the technique should be based on the surgeon's skills, education, and experience.

A Comparison of Outcomes Between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.

Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study

Comparison of Common Postoperative Complications Between Lichtenstein Open Repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Repair for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia

[The Surgical Strategy for Laparoscopic Approach in Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair: 213 Cases Report].

Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs

Comparison of the effect of two different tension free operations in recurrent inguinal hernia repair

Retrospective analysis on the selection of surgical procedures for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

TEP versus Lichtenstein, which one to choose? A retrospective cohort study

Laparoscopic versus lichtenstein hernioplasty for inguinal hernias: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia

Chronic inguinal pain post-hernioplasty. Laparo-endoscopic surgery vs lichtenstein repair: systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and Lichtenstein repair

A study on the approach to laparoscopic repair for groin hernias

Comparison of open preperitoneal repair with Lichtenstein repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein tension-free open mesh inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomized study

Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias.

Laparoscopic Experience for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Single Center for 14 Years

A comparative study of TAPP and TEP repairring inguinal hernia