Abstract:1 Despite numerous studies that have investigated the effects of physical disturbance on marine benthic communities, deducing the ecological significance of such events has been hampered by the specificity of individual studies. Less stable habitats (coarse, clean sands) are thought to recover more quickly than stable (muddy sands and mud) habitats but so far an empirical test of this paradigm has been lacking. 2 We describe a large‐scale field experiment that investigated the response of marine benthic communities within a variety of sediment types (clean sand, silty sand, muddy sand and mud) to physical disturbance. Sites were sampled for macrofauna and habitat characteristics (sediment organic content and water content, depth of water within disturbed pits) following disturbance, in order to examine any relationship between the rate of physical and biological recovery. 3 There were no detectable changes to the measured physical parameters following the disturbance with the exception of the water depth within disturbed areas. It was not possible to derive a linear relationship between the measured habitat characteristics (percentage silt and clay content) and the recovery trajectory of the associated community. However, the rate of sediment infilling of disturbed plots was strongly correlated to the recovery rate of the numbers of individuals within disturbed areas. 4 Clean sand communities had the most rapid recovery rate following disturbance, whereas communities from muddy sand habitats had the slowest physical and biological recovery rates. These findings concur with the predictions of a meta analysis of fishing disturbances for similar habitats. 5 We suggest that physical and biological recovery rates are mediated by a combination of physical, chemical and biological factors that differ in their relative importance in different habitats. Monitoring the infilling rate of physically disturbed patches of sediment has the potential to become a useful tool to predict the recovery rate of associated communities. Despite numerous studies that have investigated the effects of physical disturbance on marine benthic communities, deducing the ecological significance of such events has been hampered by the specificity of individual studies. Less stable habitats (coarse, clean sands) are thought to recover more quickly than stable (muddy sands and mud) habitats but so far an empirical test of this paradigm has been lacking. We describe a large‐scale field experiment that investigated the response of marine benthic communities within a variety of sediment types (clean sand, silty sand, muddy sand and mud) to physical disturbance. Sites were sampled for macrofauna and habitat characteristics (sediment organic content and water content, depth of water within disturbed pits) following disturbance, in order to examine any relationship between the rate of physical and biological recovery. There were no detectable changes to the measured physical parameters following the disturbance with the exception of the water depth within disturbed areas. It was not possible to derive a linear relationship between the measured habitat characteristics (percentage silt and clay content) and the recovery trajectory of the associated community. However, the rate of sediment infilling of disturbed plots was strongly correlated to the recovery rate of the numbers of individuals within disturbed areas. Clean sand communities had the most rapid recovery rate following disturbance, whereas communities from muddy sand habitats had the slowest physical and biological recovery rates. These findings concur with the predictions of a meta analysis of fishing disturbances for similar habitats. We suggest that physical and biological recovery rates are mediated by a combination of physical, chemical and biological factors that differ in their relative importance in different habitats. Monitoring the infilling rate of physically disturbed patches of sediment has the potential to become a useful tool to predict the recovery rate of associated communities.

Intertidal soft-sediment community does not respond to disturbance as postulated by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis

Intermediate Disturbances Enhance Microbial Enzyme Activities in Soil Ecosystems

Disturbance-Induced Changes in Population Size Structure Promote Coral Biodiversity

Recovery rates of benthic communities following physical disturbance

Disturbance Effects on Species Diversity and Functional Diversity in Riparian and Upland Plant Communities.

Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream macroinvertebrates

Stabilizing effects of spatially heterogeneous disturbance via reduced spatial synchrony on a rocky shore community

Timing is everything: priority effects alter community invasibility after disturbance

Effects of Disturbance Type and Microhabitat on Species and Functional Diversity Relationship in Stream-Bank Plant Communities

Community type and disturbance type interact to determine disturbance response: implications for extending the environmental filter metaphor

Author Response for "non‐linear Thresholds in the Effects of Island Area on Functional Diversity in Woody Plant Communities"

Scaling Disturbance Instead of Richness to Better Understand Anthropogenic Impacts on Biodiversity

Experimental seabed disturbance effects on Chatham Rise deep-sea meiofaunal communities, Southwest Pacific

Disturbance frequency and community structure in a twenty-five year intervention study

Disturbance has lasting effects on functional traits and diversity of grassland plant communities

Disturbance structures canopy and understory productivity along an environmental gradient

Diversity in Phytoplankton Communities: A Field Test of the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis

Effects of experimental in situ seabed disturbance on deep-sea macrofaunal communities of Chatham Rise, Southwest Pacific

Limited Impacts of Extensive Human Land Use on Dominance, Specialization, and Biotic Homogenization in Boreal Plant Communities

Do community changes persist after irruptive population dynamics? A case study from an invasive species boom and bust

Detecting the Effects of Fishing on Seabed Community Diversity: Importance of Scale and Sample Size