THE CLOSE ENVIRONMENT OF 24 Μm GALAXIES AT 0.6 <z< 1.0 IN THE COSMOS FIELD

K. I. Caputi,K. Kovac,M. Bolzonella,S. J. Lilly,G. Zamorani,H. Aussel,D. Sanders,S. Bardelli,A. Bongiorno,T. Contini,G. Coppa,O. Cucciati,S. de la Torre,L. de Ravel,P. Franzetti,D. Frayer,B. Garilli,A. Iovino,P. Kampczyk,J. -P. Kneib,C. Knobel,F. Lamareille,J. F. Le Borgne,V. Le Brun,O. Le Fevre,E. Le Floc'h,A. Leauthaud,C. Maier,V. Mainieri,M. Mignoli,R. Pello,Y. Peng,E. Perez-Montero,E. Ricciardelli,M. Salvato,M. Scodeggio,N. Scoville,J. Silverman,J. Surace,M. Tanaka,L. Tasca,L. Tresse,D. Vergani,E. Zucca,U. Abbas,D. Bottini,P. Capak,A. Cappi,C. M. Carollo,P. Cassata,A. Cimatti,M. Fumana,O. Ilbert,J. Kartaltepe,D. Maccagni,C. Marinoni,H. McCracken,P. Memeo,B. Meneux,P. Oesch,C. Porciani,L. Pozzetti,A. Renzini,R. Scaramella,C. Scarlata
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/691/1/91
2009-01-01
Abstract:We investigate the close environment of 203 Spitzer 24 μm -selected sources at 0.6 < z < 1.0 using zCOSMOS-bright redshifts and spectra of I < 22.5 AB mag galaxies, over 1.5 deg2 of the COSMOS field. We quantify the degree of passivity of the luminous and ultra-luminous IR galaxy (LIRG and ULIRG, respectively) environments by analyzing the fraction of close neighbors with Dn(4000)>1.4. We find that LIRGs at 0.6 < z < 0.8 live in more passive environments than those of other optical galaxies that have the same stellar mass distribution. Instead, ULIRGs inhabit more active regions (e.g., LIRGs and ULIRGs at 0.6 < z < 0.8 have, respectively, (42.0 ± 4.9)% and (24.5 ± 5.9)% of neighbors with Dn(4000)>1.4 within 1 Mpc and ±500 km s−1). The contrast between the activities of the close environments of LIRGs and ULIRGs appears especially enhanced in the COSMOS field density peak at z ∼ 0.67, because LIRGs on this peak have a larger fraction of passive neighbors, while ULIRGs have as active close environments as those outside the large-scale structure. The differential environmental activity is related to the differences in the distributions of stellar mass ratios between LIRGs/ULIRGs and their close neighbors, as well as in the general local density fields. At 0.8 < z < 1.0, instead, we find no differences in the environment densities of ULIRGs and other similarly massive galaxies, in spite of the differential activities. We discuss a possible scenario to explain these findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?