Improved Limit on Thera225electric Dipole Moment

Michael Bishof,Richard H. Parker,Kevin G. Bailey,John P. Greene,Roy J. Holt,Mukut R. Kalita,Wolfgang Korsch,Nathan D. Lemke,Zheng-Tian Lu,Peter Mueller,Thomas P. O'Connor,Jaideep T. Singh,Matthew R. Dietrich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.94.025501
IF: 3.199
2016-01-01
Physical Review C
Abstract:Background: Octupole-deformed nuclei, such as that of Ra-225, are expected to amplify observable atomic electric dipole moments (EDMs) that arise from time-reversal and parity-violating interactions in the nuclear medium. In 2015 we reported the first "proof-of-principle" measurement of the Ra-225 atomic EDM.Purpose: This work reports on the first of several experimental upgrades to improve the statistical sensitivity of our Ra-225 EDM measurements by orders of magnitude and evaluates systematic effects that contribute to current and future levels of experimental sensitivity.Method: Laser-cooled and trapped Ra-225 atoms are held between two high-voltage electrodes in an ultrahigh-vacuum chamber at the center of a magnetically-shielded environment. We observe Larmor precession in a uniform magnetic field using nuclear-spin-dependent laser light scattering and look for a phase shift proportional to the applied electric field, which indicates the existence of an EDM. The main improvement to our measurement technique is an order-of-magnitude increase in spin-precession time, which is enabled by an improved vacuum system and a reduction in trap-induced heating.Results: We have measured the Ra-225 atomic EDM to be less than 1.4 x 10(-23) e cm (95% confidence upper limit), which is a factor of 36 improvement over our previous result.Conclusions: Our evaluation of systematic effects shows that this measurement is completely limited by statistical uncertainty. Combining this measurement technique with planned experimental upgrades, we project a statistical sensitivity at the 1 x 10(-28) e cm level and a total systematic uncertainty at the 4 x 10(-29) e cm level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?