Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinic efficacy, complication and prognosis of different interventional modalities in the treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms. Methods Between January 2001 and December 2010, 134 patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approaches in the Department of Neurosurgery of Changhai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 134 patients, 11 had been treated by parent artery occlusion, 20 by coil embolization, 78 by stent-assisted coil, and the rest 25 patients by Tubridge. Patients were followed up for 6~44 months after the procedure. Angiographic results were evaluated with Raymond grading system, whereas clinical outcomes were evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Favorable prognosis rate when discharge, the cure rate, the recurrence rate and favorable prognosis rate when follow-up, complication incidence were compared. Results The rate of favorable prognosis in the parent artery occlusion group was 100%, coil embolization group was 70.0%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 91% and flow-diverter device group was 100%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0030). At the time oflast follow-up, the cure rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 63.6%, coil embolization group was 5.6%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 37.2% and flow-diverter device group was 72%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0002). At the time of last follow-up, the recurrence rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 0%, coil embolization group was 83.3%, stentassisted coil embolization group was 30.8% and flow-diverter device group was 0%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P<0.0001). The last follow-up favorable prognosis rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 100%, coil embolization group was 75%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 90% and flow-diverter device group was 100%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0209). The complication incidence of the parent artery occlusion group was 27.3%, coil embolization group was 30%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 14.1% and flow-diverter device group was 0%; however, there were no statistical differences in the complication incidence between the four groups (P=0.0650). Conclusion Endovascular treatment of large or giant intracranial aneurysms is very challenging. Coil embolization is often associated with a very high recurrence rate, stent-assisted coil embolization can reduce the recurrence rate, parent artery occlusion gets satisfied favorable prognosis and recurrence rate, but the complication incidence is relatively high, the preliminary clinical results of flow diverter device appear to be satisfactory.

Predictors of Periprocedural Complications and Angiographic Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Large and Giant Intracranial Posterior Circulation Aneurysms

Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatments for Unruptured Intracranial Large or Giant Aneurysms in Internal Carotid Artery

Different Interventional Treatments of Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms:a Single Center Experience

Predictors of Clinical and Angiographic Outcome After Surgical or Endovascular Therapy of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms

Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: Complications and Clinical Outcomes

Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Basilar Artery Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Embolization Device: Complications and Outcomes

Endovascular embolization is applicable for large and giant intracranial aneurysms: experience in one center with long-term angiographic follow-up.

Analysis of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms with Different Outcomes in the Same Patient after Endovascular Treatment.

Outcomes and Complications after the Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Periprocedural cerebrovascular complications and 30-day outcomes of endovascular treatment for intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms

Comparison of Three Different Endovascular Approaches for the Treatment of Intracranial Giant or Large Type Aneurysms

Risk factors for periprocedural ischemic stroke following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Significant flow velocity reduction at the intracranial aneurysm neck after endovascular treatment leads to favourable angiographic outcome: a prospective study

Safety and Long-Term Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Small Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms by Coiling with or Without Stent: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Predictors of recurrence and complications for the endovascular treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm: A high-volume center experience over 12 years

Endovascular Treatments for Distal Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms

Periprocedural Complications Associated with Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in 1764 Cases

Medium and long-term effects of Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of large and giant intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms

Predisposing factors for recanalization of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular embolization: a multivariate study.

Endovascular Management of Cerebral Aneurysms of the Posterior Cerebral Artery

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Posterior Circulation Cerebral Aneurysms.