Abstract:In Bourlard and Kamp (Biol Cybern 59(4):291-294, 1998), it was theoretically proven that autoencoders (AE) with single hidden layer (previously called "auto-associative multilayer perceptrons") were, in the best case, implementing singular value decomposition (SVD) Golub and Reinsch (Linear algebra, Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions, pp 134-151. Springer, 1971), equivalent to principal component analysis (PCA) Hotelling (Educ Psychol 24(6/7):417-441, 1993); Jolliffe (Principal component analysis, springer series in statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York ). That is, AE are able to derive the eigenvalues that represent the amount of variance covered by each component even with the presence of the nonlinear function (sigmoid-like, or any other nonlinear functions) present on their hidden units. Today, with the renewed interest in "deep neural networks" (DNN), multiple types of (deep) AE are being investigated as an alternative to manifold learning Cayton (Univ California San Diego Tech Rep 12(1-17):1, 2005) for conducting nonlinear feature extraction or fusion, each with its own specific (expected) properties. Many of those AE are currently being developed as powerful, nonlinear encoder-decoder models, or used to generate reduced and discriminant feature sets that are more amenable to different modeling and classification tasks. In this paper, we start by recalling and further clarifying the main conclusions of Bourlard and Kamp (Biol Cybern 59(4):291-294, 1998), supporting them by extensive empirical evidences, which were not possible to be provided previously (in 1988), due to the dataset and processing limitations. Upon full understanding of the underlying mechanisms, we show that it remains hard (although feasible) to go beyond the state-of-the-art PCA/SVD techniques for auto-association. Finally, we present a brief overview on different autoencoder models that are mainly in use today and discuss their rationale, relations and application areas.

Broad and Pseudoinverse Learning for Autoencoder

Pseudoinverse Learning Algorithom for Fast Sparse Autoencoder Training.

Autoencoder, Low Rank Approximation and Pseudoinverse Learning Algorithm.

Fast Image Recognition with Gabor Filter and Pseudoinverse Learning AutoEncoders

Pseudoinverse Learners - New Trend and Applications to Big Data.

DensePILAE: a feature reuse pseudoinverse learning algorithm for deep stacked autoencoder

Boosting and Residual Learning Scheme with Pseudoinverse Learners

A NEW TRAINING ALGORITHM OF AUTOENCODER COMBINING LATERAL INHIBITION MECHANISM

A Robust Automated Machine Learning System with Pseudoinverse Learning.

PILAE: A Non-gradient Descent Learning Scheme for Deep Feedforward Neural Networks

A pseudoinverse learning algorithm for feedforward neural networks with stacked generalization applications to software reliability growth data

Autoencoders reloaded

Review of Pseudoinverse Learning Algorithm for Multilayer Neural Networks and Applications.

A Pseudoinverse Incremental Algorithm For Fast Training Deep Neural Networks With Application To Spectra Pattern Recognition

Semi-adaptive Synergetic Two-way Pseudoinverse Learning System

Learning Inverse Mapping by Autoencoder Based Generative Adversarial Nets.

A PCA-like Autoencoder

Are We Using Autoencoders in a Wrong Way?

Image Recognition with Haar Wavelet and Pseudoinverse Learning Algorithm Based Autoencoders

Why should autoencoders work?

A comprehensive survey on design and application of autoencoder in deep learning