Abstract:Growing access to different sources of airborne LiDAR, including data acquired from airplanes, helicopters and unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs), is transforming our ability to capture the 3D structure of forests at scale. However, considerable uncertainty remains as to how comparable structural metrics derived from these various platforms are to each other. Using LiDAR data acquired concurrently from airplanes and UAVs across 115 sites in an open‐canopy woodland ecosystem in Australia, we tested the robustness of 32 commonly used canopy structural metrics. We show that many widely used canopy structural metrics show poor agreement between these two platforms, but were also able to identify a subset of metrics that provide a robust and ecologically intuitive way of characterizing the structure of open‐canopy forests worldwide. LiDAR data acquired from airplanes and helicopters – known as airborne laser scanning (ALS) – are widely regarded as the gold standard for characterizing the 3D structure of forests at scale. But in the last decade, advances in unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies have led to a rapid rise in the use of UAV laser scanning (ULS) for mapping forest structure. As both ALS and ULS data become increasingly available, they are being used to derive an ever‐growing number of metrics designed to measure different facets of canopy structure. However, which metrics can be robustly retrieved from both ALS and ULS platforms remains unclear. To address this question, we acquired coincident, high‐density ALS and ULS scans covering 115 plots (4‐ha in size) in an open‐canopy temperate ecosystem in Western Australia. Using this unique dataset, we quantified 32 canopy structural metrics related to canopy height, openness and heterogeneity, including metrics calculated directly from the point clouds and ones measured from derived canopy height models (CHM). Overall, we found that ALS and ULS‐derived metrics were strongly correlated (r2 = 0.90). However, this high degree of correlation masked considerable systematic differences between platforms. Specifically, point cloud metrics were less strongly (r2 = 0.87) correlated and had higher bias (10.7%) compared to CHM‐derived ones (r2 = 0.98; bias = 2.5%). Similarly, metrics of canopy openness and heterogeneity were less strongly correlated (r2 = 0.84 and 0.87) and exhibited greater bias (14.4 and 7.9%) than ones relating to canopy height (r2 = 0.96; bias = 3.8%). Our results indicate that only a small subset of the 32 metrics we tested were directly comparable between ALS and ULS platforms. Consequently, future efforts to combine laser scanning data across platforms and instruments should think carefully about which metrics are most appropriate, especially when working with point cloud data.

Comparison of Canopy Cover Estimations from Airborne LiDAR, Aerial Imagery, and Satellite Imagery.

Analysis of the Spatial Differences in Canopy Height Models from UAV LiDAR and Photogrammetry

An adaptive directional model for estimating vegetation canopy height using space-borne photon counting laser altimetry data

Regional Sampling of Forest Canopy Covers Using UAV Visible Stereoscopic Imagery for Assessment of Satellite-Based Products in Northeast China

Estimation of canopy height based on multi-source remote sensing data using forest structure aided sample selection

Comparison of the inversion ability in extrapolating forest canopy height by integration of LiDAR data and different optical remote sensing products

A Comparative Study to Evaluate Accuracy on Canopy Height and Density Using UAV, ALS, and Fieldwork

Combining visual interpretation and image segmentation to derive canopy cover index from high resolution satellite imagery in functionally diverse coniferous forests

Comparative Study on Remote Sensing Methods for Forest Height Mapping in Complex Mountainous Environments

Using canopy height model derived from UAV imagery as an auxiliary for spectral data to estimate the canopy cover of mixed broadleaf forests

Estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass and Leaf Area Index Based on Digital Aerial Photograph Data in Northeast China

High-resolution mapping of forest canopy height using machine learning by coupling ICESat-2 LiDAR with Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data

Robust retrieval of forest canopy structural attributes using multi‐platform airborne LiDAR

Estimating Forest Canopy Height based on GEDI Lidar Data and Multi-source Remote Sensing Images

Estimation of FPAR and FPAR Profile for Maize Canopies Using Airborne LiDAR

Forest Canopy Height Retrieval and Analysis Using Random Forest Model with Multi-Source Remote Sensing Integration

Effects of Forest Canopy Structure on Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Landsat Imagery

The Transferability of Random Forest in Canopy Height Estimation from Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data

A comparative analysis of modeling approaches and canopy height-based data sources for mapping forest growing stock volume in a northern subtropical ecosystem of China

An Integrated Method for Estimating Forest-Canopy Closure Based on UAV LiDAR Data

Estimation of Forest Stock Volume Combining Airborne LiDAR Sampling Approaches with Multi-Sensor Imagery