Efficacy and Predictive Factors Analysis of Androgen Deprivation Plus Novel Hormone Therapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for High‐Risk Prostate Cancer

Hanyang Tao,Fan Wu,Rui Li,Xinxing Du,Yinjie Zhu,Liang Dong,Jiahua Pan,Baijun Dong,Wei Xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24817
2024-11-05
The Prostate
Abstract:Background This investigation explored the clinical features, pathological outcomes, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) duration among high‐risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in combination with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Additionally, we identified prognostic indicators that discern pathological complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR. Methods In total, we examined 76 HRPC patients, who received NAT with either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus apalutamide or ADT plus abiraterone, with subsequent RP and PLND. We conducted a genetic evaluation of patients receiving neoadjuvant apalutamide. Additionally, patient pathological outcomes, circulating prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response rates, and BCR duration were analyzed. Lastly, we employed uni‐ and multivariate analyses to screen for prognostic factors that govern pCR or MRD and BCR duration. Results Patient median age and median PSA at presentation were 69 years (IQR: 66–73), and 47.6 ng/mL (IQR: 24.1–105.75), respectively. We observed marked changes in pCR or MRD rates between the two cohorts. In particular, the ADT plus apalutamide cohort (51.5%) exhibited enhanced rates relative to the ADT plus abiraterone cohort (25.6%) (p = 0.03). The median BCR duration was substantially prolonged among neoadjuvant apalutamide cohort relative to the neoadjuvant abiraterone cohort (261 days vs. 76 days, p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis, we revealed that the postintervention pre‐RP PSA content (≤ 0.1 ng/mL vs. > 0.1 ng/mL) remained a substantial stand‐alone indicator of pCR or MRD (odds ratio: 10.712, 95% CI: 2.725–42.105, p
endocrinology & metabolism,urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?